Skip to content

🎨 Palette: [빈 디렉토리 상태 접근성 개선] - #176

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
palette-ux-empty-dir-accessibility-12329602747052026234
Closed

🎨 Palette: [빈 디렉토리 상태 접근성 개선]#176
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
palette-ux-empty-dir-accessibility-12329602747052026234

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💡 What:

  • 비어 있는 디렉토리 렌더링 시 출력되는 이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다. 메시지를 감싸는 <div>role="status"(ARIA 라이브 리전 역할) 속성을 추가했습니다.

🎯 Why:

  • 기존에는 디렉토리가 비어 있을 때 이를 화면에 시각적으로만 표시하여, 보조 기기(스크린 리더 등)를 사용하는 사용자는 상태 변화나 빈 화면의 의미를 명확히 파악하기 어려웠습니다. role="status"를 추가하여 접근성 트리에 상태 메시지로 전달되게 함으로써 이러한 문제를 해결합니다.

📸 Before/After:

  • Before: <div class="empty-dir">이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다.</div>
  • After: <div class="empty-dir" role="status">이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다.</div>

Accessibility:

  • ARIA live region 기능을 활용해 스크린 리더가 빈 디렉토리 상태를 명확히 사용자에게 읽어주도록 시맨틱 마크업을 개선했습니다.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 12329602747052026234 started by @seonghobae

생성된 디렉토리 트리의 HTML에서, 목록이 비어 있을 때 표시되는 텍스트 요소에 `role="status"` 속성을 추가하였습니다.
이를 통해 화면 판독기(스크린 리더) 사용자가 시각적 단서 없이도 디렉토리가 비어 있다는 상태 변화를 명확하게 인지할 수 있도록 접근성을 개선했습니다.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

생성된 디렉토리 트리의 HTML에서, 목록이 비어 있을 때 표시되는 텍스트 요소에 `role="status"` 속성을 추가하였습니다.
이를 통해 화면 판독기(스크린 리더) 사용자가 시각적 단서 없이도 디렉토리가 비어 있다는 상태 변화를 명확하게 인지할 수 있도록 접근성을 개선했습니다.
생성된 디렉토리 트리의 HTML에서, 목록이 비어 있을 때 표시되는 텍스트 요소에 `role="status"` 속성을 추가하였습니다.
이를 통해 화면 판독기(스크린 리더) 사용자가 시각적 단서 없이도 디렉토리가 비어 있다는 상태 변화를 명확하게 인지할 수 있도록 접근성을 개선했습니다.
생성된 HTML 목록이 비어 있을 때 화면 판독기(스크린 리더) 사용자가 시각적 단서 없이도 디렉토리가 비어 있다는 상태를 명확하게 인지할 수 있도록 `role="status"` 속성을 추가하였습니다.

@opencode-agentopencode-agentBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 994471ba47caf8125459f5bd9475c0c814859f98.

  • Head SHA: 994471ba47caf8125459f5bd9475c0c814859f98

  • Workflow run: 29546613975

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 994471ba47caf8125459f5bd9475c0c814859f98
  • Workflow run: 29546613975
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 994471ba47caf8125459f5bd9475c0c814859f98.

  • Head SHA: 994471ba47caf8125459f5bd9475c0c814859f98

  • Workflow run: 29546613975

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@seonghobaeChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Closing as superseded by #262 at exact head 642fc98ae09329e158e6cba9974a7894c89dd3e3. This PR's production change (role="status" on the empty-directory message) is fully contained there, together with the aligned decorative folder icon, aria-hidden="true", and broader regression coverage. Consolidating on one canonical branch avoids competing conflict repairs and duplicate exact-head checks.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing as superseded by #262 at exact head 642fc98ae09329e158e6cba9974a7894c89dd3e3. This PR's production change (role="status" on the empty-directory message) is fully contained there, together with the aligned decorative folder icon, aria-hidden="true", and broader regression coverage. Consolidating on one canonical branch avoids competing conflict repairs and duplicate exact-head checks.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #262 and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@seonghobae