Skip to content

🛡️ Sentinel: [security improvement] 민감한 파일 확장자 정보 노출 방지 - #180

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
sentinel-info-exposure-7489405158932543770
Closed

🛡️ Sentinel: [security improvement] 민감한 파일 확장자 정보 노출 방지#180
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
sentinel-info-exposure-7489405158932543770

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
💡 Vulnerability: 디렉토리 목록(HTML) 생성 시, 백업 파일(.bak, .swp)이나 인증키 파일(.pem, .key 등)과 같이 민감한 정보를 담을 수 있는 파일들이 기본적으로 제외되지 않아 정보 노출(Information Exposure) 위험이 있었습니다.
🎯 Impact: 공격자나 인가되지 않은 사용자가 디렉토리를 탐색하며 중요 시스템 정보, 소스 코드 백업, 또는 인증서 등을 탈취할 수 있습니다.
🔧 Fix: html4tree/main.ktprocess_ignore_file 함수에 동적 필터링 규칙을 추가하여, 널리 쓰이는 민감한 파일 확장자(.pem, .key, .p12, .pfx, .keystore, .bak, .swp~로 끝나는 백업 파일)들을 디렉토리 목록에서 제외하도록 개선했습니다. 또한, 관련 보안 테스트 코드를 추가했습니다.
✅ Verification: ./gradlew test jacocoTestReport jacocoTestCoverageVerification 명령어를 통해 모든 단위 테스트가 통과하며, 신규 코드의 Jacoco 테스트 커버리지가 100%임을 확인했습니다.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7489405158932543770 started by @seonghobae

💡 취약점: 인증 키(.pem, .key 등) 및 백업 파일(.bak, .swp)이 디렉토리 목록에 포함되어 정보 노출(Information Exposure) 위험이 존재했습니다.
🎯 영향: 공격자가 민감한 시스템 및 인증 정보를 다운로드할 수 있습니다.
🔧 수정 사항: `process_ignore_file`에서 `.pem`, `.key`, `.p12`, `.pfx`, `.keystore`, `.bak`, `.swp`, `~` 확장자를 가진 파일들을 동적으로 제외하도록 필터링을 강화했습니다.
✅ 검증: Jacoco 테스트 커버리지 100%를 유지하며 해당 확장자들이 제외되는 것을 단위 테스트로 검증했습니다.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

💡 취약점: 인증 키(.pem, .key 등) 및 백업 파일(.bak, .swp)이 디렉토리 목록에 포함되어 정보 노출(Information Exposure) 위험이 존재했습니다.
🎯 영향: 공격자가 민감한 시스템 및 인증 정보를 다운로드할 수 있습니다.
🔧 수정 사항: `process_ignore_file`에서 `.pem`, `.key`, `.p12`, `.pfx`, `.keystore`, `.bak`, `.swp`, `~` 확장자를 가진 파일들을 동적으로 제외하도록 필터링을 강화했습니다.
✅ 검증: Jacoco 테스트 커버리지 100%를 유지하며 해당 확장자들이 제외되는 것을 단위 테스트로 검증했습니다.
💡 취약점: 인증 키(.pem, .key 등) 및 백업 파일(.bak, .swp)이 디렉토리 목록에 포함되어 정보 노출(Information Exposure) 위험이 존재했습니다.
🎯 영향: 공격자가 민감한 시스템 및 인증 정보를 다운로드할 수 있습니다.
🔧 수정 사항: `process_ignore_file`에서 `.pem`, `.key`, `.p12`, `.pfx`, `.keystore`, `.bak`, `.swp`, `~` 확장자를 가진 파일들을 동적으로 제외하도록 필터링을 강화했습니다.
✅ 검증: Jacoco 테스트 커버리지 100%를 유지하며 해당 확장자들이 제외되는 것을 단위 테스트로 검증했습니다.
💡 취약점: 인증 키(.pem, .key 등) 및 백업 파일(.bak, .swp)이 디렉토리 목록에 포함되어 정보 노출(Information Exposure) 위험이 존재했습니다.
🎯 영향: 공격자가 민감한 시스템 및 인증 정보를 다운로드할 수 있습니다.
🔧 수정 사항: `process_ignore_file`에서 `.pem`, `.key`, `.p12`, `.pfx`, `.keystore`, `.bak`, `.swp`, `~` 확장자를 가진 파일들을 동적으로 제외하도록 필터링을 강화했습니다.
✅ 검증: Jacoco 테스트 커버리지 100%를 유지하며 해당 확장자들이 제외되는 것을 단위 테스트로 검증했습니다.

@opencode-agentopencode-agentBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 660d9a63ca5b572eeb81a2c4d5c1fce6a1882e59.

  • Head SHA: 660d9a63ca5b572eeb81a2c4d5c1fce6a1882e59

  • Workflow run: 30424172763

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 660d9a63ca5b572eeb81a2c4d5c1fce6a1882e59
  • Workflow run: 30424172763
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 660d9a63ca5b572eeb81a2c4d5c1fce6a1882e59.

  • Head SHA: 660d9a63ca5b572eeb81a2c4d5c1fce6a1882e59

  • Workflow run: 30424172763

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@seonghobaeChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Closing as superseded by current-base #424. #424 preserves this PR’s key, certificate, keystore, backup, swap, and editor-backup exclusions; adds the union of credential, truststore, database, SQL, log, and packet-capture families; performs locale-stable case-insensitive matching; and has real RED→GREEN evidence on exact head 79c9631abf18adba543cb68ae99759eb0f1ccecb (RED 31482449647; GREEN CI 31482588295, Security 31482588308, SAST 31482588279).

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing as superseded by current-base #424. #424 preserves this PR’s key, certificate, keystore, backup, swap, and editor-backup exclusions; adds the union of credential, truststore, database, SQL, log, and packet-capture families; performs locale-stable case-insensitive matching; and has real RED→GREEN evidence on exact head 79c9631abf18adba543cb68ae99759eb0f1ccecb (RED 31482449647; GREEN CI 31482588295, Security 31482588308, SAST 31482588279).

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@seonghobae