Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 상태의 접근성 및 시각적 일관성 개선 - #184
Conversation
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current heade2e2da3c025a33dd95027db5e5afc8c364c6bcca.Head SHA:
e2e2da3c025a33dd95027db5e5afc8c364c6bccaWorkflow run: 30424178947
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
seonghobae
commented
Aug 5, 2026
Closing as superseded by the protected branch and draft #360. |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by the protected branch and draft #360, and stopping work on this task. |
💡 What: 빈 디렉토리 메시지 영역에 flexbox 레이아웃을 적용하고, 폴더 아이콘(
📂) 및 시맨틱 역할(role="status")을 추가했습니다.🎯 Why: 스크린 리더 환경에서 정적인 디렉토리 빈 상태 목록이 명확하게 안내되지 않는 문제를 해결하고, 시각적으로 목록 내 다른 링크 항목들과 일관성을 유지하기 위함입니다.
📸 Before/After: N/A (시각적 변경 및 접근성 향상)
♿ Accessibility:
role="status"를 추가하여 스크린 리더 사용자가 의도된 빈 목록임을 인식할 수 있도록 하고, 장식용 아이콘에는aria-hidden="true"를 적용했습니다.PR created automatically by Jules for task 15729574947694873148 started by @seonghobae