🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 상태 UI 시각적 일관성 향상

[seonghobae]

💡 What: The UX enhancement added
빈 디렉토리를 안내하는 텍스트 영역에 열린 폴더 아이콘(📁)을 추가하고 기존 파일 리스트와 동일한 Flexbox 정렬(간격)을 상속받도록 수정했습니다.

🎯 Why: The user problem it solves
기존에는 파일이 없는 디렉토리에서 안내 문구만 텍스트로 렌더링되어 다른 디렉토리 목록(아이콘+텍스트 구조)과 시각적으로 이질감이 심하고 가독성이 떨어졌습니다. 동일한 레이아웃 구조를 적용하여 UI의 시각적 일관성을 크게 높였습니다.

📸 Before/After: Screenshots if visual change
(Playwright를 통해 렌더링된 스크린샷과 동영상 결과물 확인 완료)

• Before: <li><div class="empty-dir">이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다.</div></li>
• After: <li><div class="empty-dir dir-link"><span class="icon" aria-hidden="true">&#128194;</span> <span>이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다.</span></div></li> (아이콘과 텍스트가 가로로 깔끔하게 정렬됨)

♿ Accessibility: Any a11y improvements made
장식용 유니코드 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true" 속성을 부여하여 스크린 리더 사용자가 해당 기호를 읽으면서 겪을 수 있는 혼동을 사전에 방지했습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 12560904285615852420 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head fbe179565ed0e70b7ade9e951d12f4cc8340e689.

• Head SHA: fbe179565ed0e70b7ade9e951d12f4cc8340e689

• Workflow run: 30424185091

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: fbe179565ed0e70b7ade9e951d12f4cc8340e689
• Workflow run: 30424185091
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head fbe179565ed0e70b7ade9e951d12f4cc8340e689.

• Head SHA: fbe179565ed0e70b7ade9e951d12f4cc8340e689

• Workflow run: 30424185091

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by the protected branch and draft #360. Empty-state icon/flex/assistive-hiding behavior is already present; claimed Playwright evidence is not attached to this head. #360 owns the remaining browser-verifiable post-#363 readability and focus slice with WCAG 2.2 doctoring and fresh exact-head gates. No evidence is reused.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by the protected branch and draft #360. Empty-state icon/flex/assistive-hiding behavior is already present; claimed Playwright evidence is not attached to this head. #360 owns the remaining browser-verifiable post-#363 readability and focus slice with WCAG 2.2 doctoring and fresh exact-head gates. No evidence is reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.