Skip to content

🎨 Palette: 루트 디렉토리의 빈 이름 접근성 향상 - #191

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
palette/empty-dir-name-fallback-1690649494457003896
Closed

🎨 Palette: 루트 디렉토리의 빈 이름 접근성 향상#191
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
palette/empty-dir-name-fallback-1690649494457003896

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💡 What: 루트 디렉토리 크롤링 시 File.getName()이 비어있는 경우 File.absolutePath를 사용하도록 폴백을 추가했습니다.
🎯 Why: 시스템 루트 디렉토리(예: / 또는 C:\)를 처리할 때 생성되는 HTML의 <title><h1> 요소가 비어있게 되어, 스크린 리더 등 접근성 보조 기기를 사용하는 사용자가 현재 경로의 컨텍스트를 파악하기 어려운 문제가 있었습니다.
📸 Before/After: N/A (시각적 변화는 없으나, 빈 제목이 표시되던 것이 절대 경로로 표시되도록 변경됨)
♿ Accessibility: 비어있는 문서 제목과 <h1>을 절대 경로로 채워 스크린 리더 사용자의 페이지 맥락 인지 능력을 개선했습니다.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1690649494457003896 started by @seonghobae

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@opencode-agentopencode-agentBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 7e97c7b15ff1a6fbd2a28041877925aa37b4ee73.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 7e97c7b15ff1a6fbd2a28041877925aa37b4ee73
  • Workflow run: 29471526060
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 7e97c7b15ff1a6fbd2a28041877925aa37b4ee73.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@seonghobaeChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. The same filesystem-root absolute-path fallback is retained there, with required post-#363 update, one escaped shared display value, real root/non-root generated-output tests, APA 7 doctoring, changelog, exact-head quality/security gates, and independent approval. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. The same filesystem-root absolute-path fallback is retained there, with required post-#363 update, one escaped shared display value, real root/non-root generated-output tests, APA 7 doctoring, changelog, exact-head quality/security gates, and independent approval. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@seonghobae