🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 상태의 아이콘 및 접근성 개선

[seonghobae]

빈 디렉토리를 렌더링할 때 단순히 "이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다." 텍스트만 보여주지 않고, 열린 폴더 아이콘(📂)을 함께 표시하여 사용자에게 보다 직관적인 피드백을 제공합니다. 또한 장식용 아이콘을 스크린 리더가 읽지 않게 접근성을 보장하기 위해 aria-hidden="true"를 적용했으며, Flexbox CSS 속성을 사용해 아이콘과 텍스트의 정렬을 개선했습니다. 100% 테스트 커버리지가 유지되고 있음을 확인했습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3466453610540095239 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 86f7d6cc78875289efc24ee670fa1cbb7a851c6b.

• Head SHA: 86f7d6cc78875289efc24ee670fa1cbb7a851c6b

• Workflow run: 30424202827

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 86f7d6cc78875289efc24ee670fa1cbb7a851c6b
• Workflow run: 30424202827
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 86f7d6cc78875289efc24ee670fa1cbb7a851c6b.

• Head SHA: 86f7d6cc78875289efc24ee670fa1cbb7a851c6b

• Workflow run: 30424202827

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by the protected branch and draft #360. The generated empty state already has aligned decorative icon markup hidden from assistive technology; #360 owns the remaining evidence-based post-#363 contrast/focus/readability work. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by the protected branch and draft #360. The generated empty state already has aligned decorative icon markup hidden from assistive technology; #360 owns the remaining evidence-based post-#363 contrast/focus/readability work. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.

이해했습니다. 이 작업이 대체되어 더 이상 필요하지 않음을 확인했으며, 작업을 중단하겠습니다.