🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 상태 메시지에 ARIA 역할 추가

[seonghobae]

💡 What:

• src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt에서 빈 디렉토리 상태를 나타내는 <div class="empty-dir">에 role="status"를 추가했습니다.
• src/test/kotlin/html4tree/MainTest.kt 테스트 파일에 해당 속성이 포함되었는지 검증하는 Assertion을 추가했습니다.

🎯 Why:

• 스크린 리더 등 보조 기기를 사용하는 사용자는 시각적 피드백 없이 디렉토리 목록 구조를 탐색하게 됩니다.
• 목록 내용이 완전히 비어있을 때, 단순 장식용 텍스트로만 표시되면 스크린 리더가 이를 구조적인 상태 변화로 인식하지 못할 수 있습니다.
• 이를 role="status"를 부여한 요소에 담으면, 사용자가 맥락을 파악하는 데 훨씬 용이합니다.

📸 Before/After:

• Before: <div class="empty-dir">이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다.</div>
• After: <div class="empty-dir" role="status">이 디렉토리는 비어 있습니다.</div>

♿ Accessibility:

• 시각적 상태뿐만 아니라 의미론적(Semantic)으로도 "상태(Status)" 메시지임을 보조 기기에 명확하게 전달하여 웹 접근성을 향상시켰습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3236472452392278134 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 9c43d41e553a57a4387aa9bede68fe9aef1abdbc.

• Head SHA: 9c43d41e553a57a4387aa9bede68fe9aef1abdbc

• Workflow run: 30424208154

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 9c43d41e553a57a4387aa9bede68fe9aef1abdbc
• Workflow run: 30424208154
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 9c43d41e553a57a4387aa9bede68fe9aef1abdbc.

• Head SHA: 9c43d41e553a57a4387aa9bede68fe9aef1abdbc

• Workflow run: 30424208154

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by the protected branch: role="status" and its generated-page assertion are already present. Draft #360 is the single post-#363 path for remaining evidence-based visual/accessibility work. No stale evidence is reused.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by the protected branch: role="status" and its generated-page assertion are already present. Draft #360 is the single post-#363 path for remaining evidence-based visual/accessibility work. No stale evidence is reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.