🎨 Palette: [접근성 개선] 빈 디렉토리 이름에 대한 폴백 추가

[seonghobae]

💡 What (enhancement added): 루트 디렉토리처럼 이름이 비어있는 경우(예: File.getName() == "") <title> 및 <h1> 렌더링 시 디렉토리의 절대 경로(absolutePath)를 폴백으로 표시하도록 개선했습니다.
🎯 Why (user problem solved): 화면 판독기 사용자는 빈 제목과 헤딩을 만나면 현재 컨텍스트를 전혀 이해할 수 없으며, 시각적 사용자도 빈 페이지 제목과 상단 제목으로 인해 혼란을 겪습니다. 이 폴백 추가로 인해 모든 사용자가 의미 있는 컨텍스트를 얻을 수 있습니다.
📸 Before/After (screenshots if visual): (해당 없음: 텍스트 및 시맨틱 콘텐츠의 생성 변경)
♿ Accessibility (a11y improvements made): 빈 <title> 및 <h1> 태그 렌더링을 방지하여 스크린 리더 환경의 접근성을 향상시켰습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6033876254401964351 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 686bc1948b7c149af66de008a89d8be6be02124e.

• Head SHA: 686bc1948b7c149af66de008a89d8be6be02124e

• Workflow run: 30424214593

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 686bc1948b7c149af66de008a89d8be6be02124e
• Workflow run: 30424214593
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 686bc1948b7c149af66de008a89d8be6be02124e.

• Head SHA: 686bc1948b7c149af66de008a89d8be6be02124e

• Workflow run: 30424214593

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. The identical absolute-path fallback for empty root names is retained there under a bounded post-#363 accessibility contract. #364 must still consolidate one escaped label, test generated root/non-root pages, add APA 7 doctoring and changelog, and pass fresh exact-head gates plus independent approval. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.