🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 이름 폴백 제공 (접근성 향상)

[seonghobae]

💡 What: 디렉토리 이름(curr_dir.getName())이 빈 문자열인 경우 절대 경로(curr_dir.absolutePath)를 표시하도록 <title> 및 <h1> 태그의 폴백 렌더링 로직 추가.
🎯 Why: 루트 디렉토리(/ 등)의 경우 이름이 빈 문자열로 반환되어 화면 판독기 사용자가 페이지의 목적을 전혀 알 수 없는 심각한 접근성 문제가 발생했기 때문입니다.
📸 Before/After: 루트 경로 크롤링 시 <title></title> <h1></h1> 렌더링에서 <title>/</title> <h1>/</h1> 형태로 올바르게 렌더링됨.
♿ Accessibility: 빈 태그를 방지하여 화면 판독기 사용자가 현재 디렉토리 컨텍스트를 명확하게 인지할 수 있도록 접근성을 대폭 향상시켰습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 17628880528333253472 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 7bf8fa86821eaefc81b93788472e5146b1186aa2.

• Head SHA: 7bf8fa86821eaefc81b93788472e5146b1186aa2

• Workflow run: 30424226211

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 7bf8fa86821eaefc81b93788472e5146b1186aa2
• Workflow run: 30424226211
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 7bf8fa86821eaefc81b93788472e5146b1186aa2.

• Head SHA: 7bf8fa86821eaefc81b93788472e5146b1186aa2

• Workflow run: 30424226211

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. The same filesystem-root display-label fallback is retained there, but it must be rebuilt on post-#363master, reuse one escaped label, test root and ordinary generated pages, add standards doctoring and changelog, and pass fresh exact-head quality/security review plus independent approval. No result from this duplicate head is reused.