Skip to content

🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] 루트 디렉토리 제목 접근성 개선 - #330

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix-empty-title-11961850584772205133
Closed

🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] 루트 디렉토리 제목 접근성 개선#330
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix-empty-title-11961850584772205133

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💡 What: 디렉토리 이름이 비어있는 경우(예: 루트 디렉토리), 대체 텍스트로 절대 경로(absolutePath)를 표시하도록 <title><h1> 요소를 수정했습니다.
🎯 Why: 파일 시스템 루트와 같이 getName()이 빈 문자열을 반환하는 디렉토리를 처리할 때, <title><h1> 요소가 비어있게 되어 스크린 리더 사용자의 접근성을 해치고 빈 UI가 노출되는 문제를 해결하기 위함입니다.
📸 Before/After: 루트 디렉토리 인덱싱 시 빈 <title><h1>이 렌더링되던 것이, 이제는 대체된 경로로 명확히 표시됩니다.
♿ Accessibility: 의미 있는 제목과 헤더를 제공함으로써, 스크린 리더 사용자가 현재 위치를 명확히 인지할 수 있도록 접근성을 개선했습니다.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 11961850584772205133 started by @seonghobae

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:9 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6a379096-a816-4e4a-a891-015c08446925

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a859a11 and b2c7483.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .jules/palette.md
  • src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/html4tree/MainTest.kt

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobaeChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. The identical root-label fallback is retained there under the post-#363 template dependency and must be completed with one escaped display value, real generated-file regressions, standards doctoring, changelog, exact-head quality/security checks, and independent approval. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. The identical root-label fallback is retained there under the post-#363 template dependency and must be completed with one escaped display value, real generated-file regressions, standards doctoring, changelog, exact-head quality/security checks, and independent approval. No evidence from this duplicate head is reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@seonghobae