🎨 Palette: [UX improvement] 빈 루트 디렉토리 제목 개선

[seonghobae]

💡 What: 루트 디렉토리의 이름이 비어있을 때 <title> 및 <h1> 태그에 절대 경로를 표시하도록 변경했습니다.
🎯 Why: 루트 디렉토리를 렌더링할 때 빈 제목/헤더가 생성되어 사용자가 현재 위치를 파악하기 어렵고 화면 판독기가 읽을 수 없는 문제를 해결하기 위함입니다.
📸 Before/After: 루트 디렉토리의 빈 제목이 실제 경로(예: / 또는 C:\)로 대체됩니다.
♿ Accessibility: 빈 텍스트로 인해 스크린 리더 사용자가 컨텍스트를 잃는 문제를 방지하여 접근성을 향상시켰습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 1536003726743641211 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:53 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9d045994-ca4f-428c-8894-d7c76fcb6f65

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 669c4ef and 28f4e9b.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• .jules/palette.md
• src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt
• src/test/kotlin/html4tree/EmptyDirNameTest.kt

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. Both provide an absolute-path fallback when File.getName() is empty. #364 now owns the bounded current-base accessibility contract and is explicitly blocked until it is rebuilt after CSP PR #363, deduplicates the display-label computation, proves escaping and ordinary-directory behavior through real generated output, adds APA 7 doctoring and changelog, and passes fresh exact-head quality/security review. No check or review from this duplicate head is reused.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by draft canonical #364. Both provide an absolute-path fallback when File.getName() is empty. #364 now owns the bounded current-base accessibility contract and is explicitly blocked until it is rebuilt after CSP PR #363, deduplicates the display-label computation, proves escaping and ordinary-directory behavior through real generated output, adds APA 7 doctoring and changelog, and passes fresh exact-head quality/security review. No check or review from this duplicate head is reused.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.