Skip to content

🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 시각적 메타포 개선 (📂) - #390

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
palette/empty-dir-icon-10623238584035783143
Closed

🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 시각적 메타포 개선 (📂)#390
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
palette/empty-dir-icon-10623238584035783143

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

💡 What: 빈 디렉토리를 나타내는 아이콘을 정보 기호(ℹ)에서 열린 폴더 이모지(📂)로 변경했습니다.
🎯 Why: 기존 파일 및 디렉토리 아이콘(문서, 폴더 이모지)과의 시각적 메타포 일관성을 맞추어 사용자가 "비어 있는 디렉토리"임을 더 직관적으로 인지할 수 있도록 개선했습니다.
📸 Before/After: 해당 없음 (텍스트 렌더링 변경)
♿ Accessibility: 기존 시맨틱(role="status")과 aria-hidden="true" 속성은 유지되어 스크린 리더 환경에서도 동일하게 유효합니다.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 10623238584035783143 started by @seonghobae

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:19 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f3283e50-bb67-4b06-bf23-7ac5e9b08d7d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between efde64c and 070a0be.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .jules/palette.md
  • src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/html4tree/GeneratedIndexReadabilityTest.kt

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobaeChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Closing as superseded by #385. Fresh diff comparison shows both branches make the identical empty-state icon change (ℹ📂) and update the generated-readability expectation. #385 additionally asserts the emitted folder icon through the existing end-to-end MainTest, so it provides the stronger regression boundary for the same product behavior.

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing as superseded by #385. Fresh diff comparison shows both branches make the identical empty-state icon change (ℹ📂) and update the generated-readability expectation. #385 additionally asserts the emitted folder icon through the existing end-to-end MainTest, so it provides the stronger regression boundary for the same product behavior.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@seonghobae