🎨 Palette: 빈 디렉토리 상태의 접근성 개선

[seonghobae]

💡 What: 빈 디렉토리 메시지(.empty-dir)에서 role="status" 속성을 제거했습니다.
🎯 Why: 초기 페이지 로드 시 렌더링되는 정적 요소에 ARIA 라이브 리전을 사용하면 스크린 리더가 내용을 중복해서 읽거나 읽기 흐름을 방해하는 접근성 안티패턴이기 때문입니다.
📸 Before/After: 해당 없음 (시각적 변화 없음)
♿ Accessibility: 정적 메시지가 스크린 리더에서 중복으로 읽히는 문제를 방지하여 자연스러운 읽기 흐름을 제공합니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7178042039519691598 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in:41 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9e675fb2-b8a4-49fe-a3a8-6872b8e21ee6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de82f99 and b3a0191.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .jules/palette.md
• src/main/kotlin/html4tree/main.kt
• src/test/kotlin/html4tree/GeneratedIndexReadabilityTest.kt
• src/test/kotlin/html4tree/MainTest.kt

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Superseded by #473. This Jules-generated PR modifies the same static empty-directory row and the same tests. #473 is the canonical lane because it adds the explicit whole-document role="status" absence regression and durable WAI-ARIA/WCAG doctoring with a bounded claim and rollback condition. Closing this duplicate preserves one writer/review surface for the buyer-visible accessibility change. No check or review evidence transfers.

[google-labs-jules]

Superseded by #473. This Jules-generated PR modifies the same static empty-directory row and the same tests. #473 is the canonical lane because it adds the explicit whole-document role="status" absence regression and durable WAI-ARIA/WCAG doctoring with a bounded claim and rollback condition. Closing this duplicate preserves one writer/review surface for the buyer-visible accessibility change. No check or review evidence transfers.

Understood. Acknowledging that this PR has been superseded by #473 and is now obsolete. I will stop work on this task and revert my changes.