fix(guardrails): block merge bypass commands by terisuke · Pull Request #191 · Cor-Incorporated/opencode

terisuke · 2026-04-25T16:27:55Z

Summary

Treat GitHub REST API PR merges as guarded PR merges, including review and post-merge validation gates
Block reset-to-base soft/mixed syncs that bypass rebase/merge conflict guardrails
Require explicit worktree selection for codex exec reviews to avoid reviewing the wrong checkout
Add focused guardrail tests for the NFC-profile-card failure modes

Validation

bun test test/plugin/guardrail-git.test.ts test/plugin/guardrail-review.test.ts test/plugin/guardrail-secret-mask.test.ts
bun typecheck
git diff --check
bun run build
~/.local/bin/opencode --version
packages/opencode/dist/opencode-darwin-arm64/bin/opencode --version

github-actions · 2026-04-25T16:28:06Z

This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template.

What needs to be fixed:

PR description is missing required template sections. Please use the PR template.

Please edit this PR description to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.

If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.

github-actions · 2026-04-25T16:28:07Z

Thanks for your contribution!

This PR doesn't have a linked issue. All PRs must reference an existing issue.

Please:

Open an issue describing the bug/feature (if one doesn't exist)
Add Fixes #<number> or Closes #<number> to this PR description

See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR tightens the guardrail-git plugin so PR merges can’t bypass review/conflict gates via alternative merge commands, and adds regression tests to cover newly blocked flows.

Changes:

Treat gh api .../pulls/<n>/merge as a PR merge so merge/review gates run for GitHub REST API merges.
Block git reset --soft|--mixed resets to base branches to prevent bypassing rebase/merge conflict guardrails.
Require an explicit worktree flag for codex exec to avoid reviewing the wrong checkout; add focused tests for these guardrails.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File	Description
packages/opencode/test/plugin/guardrail-git.test.ts	Adds unit tests for API-merge bypass, reset-to-base bypass, and codex exec worktree requirement.
packages/guardrails/profile/plugins/guardrail-git.ts	Expands merge detection to include `gh api` merges, adds reset-to-base blocking, and enforces explicit worktree for `codex exec`.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

packages/guardrails/profile/plugins/guardrail-git.ts:313

The reset-to-base detection regex will also match refs like origin/dev-feature because dev is followed by - (a word boundary), so it can over-block resets that are not targeting the protected base branches. Tighten the ref matching so it only triggers when the target is exactly (origin/)?main|master|develop|dev as a whole token (e.g., require (?:\s|$) or end-of-ref delimiters after the branch name).

 if (/\bgit\s+rebase\b/i.test(cmd) && !/--abort\b/i.test(cmd)) {
if (/\bgit\s+rebase\s+(origin\/)?(main|master|develop)\b/i.test(cmd)) {
await ctx.mark({ rebase_session_active: true, rebase_session_at: new Date().toISOString() })

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot · 2026-04-25T16:31:59Z

+ cmd.match(/\bgh\s+api\b(?=[\s\S]*(?:^|\s)-X(?:=|\s*)PUT\b)[\s\S]*\brepos\/\S+\/pulls\/(\d+)\/merge\b/i)?.[1] ??
+ cmd.match(
+ /\bgh\s+api\b(?=[\s\S]*(?:^|\s)--method(?:=|\s+)PUT\b)[\s\S]*\brepos\/\S+\/pulls\/(\d+)\/merge\b/i,


ghPrMergeNumber only detects gh api merges when the method is spelled with a space (-X PUT / --method PUT). gh api (cobra/pflag) also supports --method=PUT and commonly -X=PUT / -XPUT, which would bypass the merge guard. Update the method detection regexes to accept the =PUT (and no-space short flag) forms so the bypass is reliably blocked.
Suggested change
cmd.match(/\bgh\s+api\b(?=[\s\S]*(?:^|\s)-X(?:=|\s*)PUT\b)[\s\S]*\brepos\/\S+\/pulls\/(\d+)\/merge\b/i)?.[1]??
cmd.match(
/\bgh\s+api\b(?=[\s\S]*(?:^|\s)--method(?:=|\s+)PUT\b)[\s\S]*\brepos\/\S+\/pulls\/(\d+)\/merge\b/i,
cmd.match(/\bgh\s+api\b(?=[\s\S]*(?:^|\s)-X(?:PUT|=PUT|\s+PUT\b))[\s\S]*\brepos\/\S+\/pulls\/(\d+)\/merge\b/i)?.[1]??
cmd.match(
/\bgh\s+api\b(?=[\s\S]*(?:^|\s)--method(?:=PUT\b|\s+PUT\b))[\s\S]*\brepos\/\S+\/pulls\/(\d+)\/merge\b/i,

Copilot · 2026-04-25T16:31:59Z

+ function codexExecWorktree(cmd: string) {
+ return (
+ cmd
+ .match(/\bcodex\s+exec\b[\s\S]*(?:\s-C|\s--cd|\s--cwd)\s+(?:"([^"]+)"|'([^']+)'|(\S+))/i)


The codex exec worktree check only matches -C <path>, --cd <path>, --cwd <path> with a whitespace-separated value. If the CLI is invoked with --cwd=<path> / --cd=<path> (or quoted paths with spaces), this guard will incorrectly block even though an explicit worktree was provided. Consider broadening the regex to accept --cwd= / --cd= / -C= forms and quoted values.
Suggested change
.match(/\bcodex\s+exec\b[\s\S]*(?:\s-C|\s--cd|\s--cwd)\s+(?:"([^"]+)"|'([^']+)'|(\S+))/i)
.match(
/\bcodex\s+exec\b[\s\S]*(?:\s-C|\s--cd|\s--cwd)(?:\s*=\s*|\s+)(?:"([^"]+)"|'([^']+)'|(\S+))/i,
)

Copilot · 2026-04-25T16:32:00Z

+ }
+
+ function sameWorktree(left: string, right: string) {


This guard currently blocks anycodex exec invocation without an explicit worktree, but the error message says "codex exec review must…". Either scope the check to review-related codex commands, or adjust the message so it matches the actual behavior (all codex exec commands).

Copilot · 2026-04-25T16:32:00Z

+ test("blocks GitHub API pull request merge bypasses", async () => {
+ await using fixture = await context()
+ const git = createGitHandlers(fixture.ctx, review())
+
+ await expect(
+ git.bashBeforeGit("gh api -X PUT repos/Cor-Incorporated/nfc-profile-card/pulls/42/merge", {}, {}),
+ ).rejects.toThrow("merge blocked")
+
+ expect(fixture.marks.some((item) => String(item.last_reason).includes("GLM code-reviewer"))).toBe(true)
+ })
+
+ test("blocks GitHub API pull request merge bypasses with equals method flags", async () => {
+ await using fixture = await context()
+ const git = createGitHandlers(fixture.ctx, review())
+
+ await expect(
+ git.bashBeforeGit("gh api --method=PUT repos/Cor-Incorporated/nfc-profile-card/pulls/42/merge", {}, {}),
+ ).rejects.toThrow("merge blocked")
+ })
+
+ test("blocks reset-to-base sync bypasses", async () => {
+ await using fixture = await context()
+ const git = createGitHandlers(fixture.ctx, review())
+
+ await expect(git.bashBeforeGit("git reset --soft origin/dev", {}, {})).rejects.toThrow("reset-to-base sync blocked")
+
+ expect(fixture.marks.at(-1)?.last_reason).toBe("branch reset sync blocked")
+ })
+
+ test("requires explicit worktree for codex exec reviews", async () => {


The new tests cover gh api -X PUT …/merge and codex exec -C …, but they don’t cover important accepted flag variants that could regress or bypass the guardrails (e.g. gh api --method=PUT …/merge, codex exec --cwd=/tmp/project …, and a non-base ref like git reset --soft origin/dev-feature). Adding these cases would help ensure the regexes don’t allow bypasses or cause false positives.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings April 25, 2026 16:27

github-actionsBot added the needs:compliance label Apr 25, 2026

github-actionsBot added the needs:issue label Apr 25, 2026

Copilotstarted reviewing on behalf of terisuke April 25, 2026 16:28 View session

fix(guardrails): block merge bypass commands
c36d867

terisuke force-pushed the codex/fix-merge-guardrail-bypasses branch from c333d10 to c36d867Compare April 25, 2026 16:30

CopilotAI reviewed Apr 25, 2026
View reviewed changes

terisuke merged commit 35baa6f into devApr 25, 2026
2 of 8 checks passed

terisuke deleted the codex/fix-merge-guardrail-bypasses branch April 25, 2026 16:35

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

fix(guardrails): block merge bypass commands - #191

fix(guardrails): block merge bypass commands#191
terisuke merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/fix-merge-guardrail-bypasses

terisuke commented Apr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Apr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Apr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

CopilotAI left a comment

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

terisuke commented Apr 25, 2026

Summary

Validation

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Apr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Apr 25, 2026

Uh oh!

CopilotAI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

CopilotAIApr 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants