Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add Mixed-auth-AllowAnonymous-workaround - #34
Conversation
75415b1 to
2745dd3Compare2745dd3 to
6465d21Compare
kevinchalet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since you sent me the link via LinkedIn, I took the liberty to add a few remarks 😃
(I focused on the OpenIddict stuff and ignored the CoreWCF part as I'm not familiar at all with the stack)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(); | ||
| builder.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might be a good idea to add a note indicating that OpenIddict also has a validation handler that uses a more recent JWT stack, can easily switch to OAuth 2.0 introspection and is compatible with any standard OAuth 2.0 implementation (i.e not just OpenIddict.Server).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
6465d21 to
a797f03Compare
No description provided.