content: full_summary batch 2 — Jasher, Assumption of Moses, Tobit (#1577) by CraigBuckmaster · Pull Request #1606 · CraigBuckmaster/ScriptureDeepDive

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T19:43:37Z

What this does

Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly 3 entries modified — byte-identical extrabiblical.json for the untouched 9 entries.

Closes

Closes#1577

Entries upgraded

Entry	Words
`jasher`	1,122
`assumption_of_moses`	1,267
`tobit`	1,313

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Markdown with ## section headers: Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading.

Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request.

Editorial notes per entry

jasher — the tricky one. Distinguishes three distinct works that circulate under the name: the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash, 11th–13th c.), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery, Jacob Ilive). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart and specifically names the 1751 work as forgery.
assumption_of_moses — traces the Jude 9 identification (Origen, Clement patristic testimony), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery of the sole Latin manuscript, and the Taxo martyrdom theology of chapter 9. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture.
tobit — traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox/Ethiopian split through the Jerome–Augustine divergence (4th–5th c.) and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's hebraica veritas. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments (4Q196–4Q200) confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments.

Merge order (important)

Base: PR #1605 (batch 1). This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order:

master
└─ #1589 (12 brief entries)
└─ #1605 (batch 1: 1_enoch / 2_enoch / jubilees)
└─ this PR (batch 2: jasher / assumption_of_moses / tobit)
└─ #1578 (batch 3 — upcoming)
└─ #1579 (batch 4 — upcoming)

Each batch branches off the previous so extrabiblical.json stays byte-identical for the untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches.

Diff vs base (PR #1605):1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) — only the 3 full_summary fields flip from null to populated prose.

How I verified

python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) ✅

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Same as batch 1 — inline scholarly citation within the summary prose rather than array expansion. Primary sources named: Fitzmyer's Tobit (de Gruyter 2003), Tromp's Assumption of Moses (Brill 1993), Charlesworth's OTP, Priest's translation, Moore's Anchor Tobit, the Gelasian Decree's list of rejected apocrypha, Origen and Clement's testimony, Mack's ISBE article on Jasher.

Rollback

Revert this PR. The 3 full_summary fields return to null; no schema impact. Batches 1, 3, 4 unaffected (chained branches handle their own deltas).

Generated by Claude Code

…1577) Second of four full_summary backfill batches. Branched off HWGTB-P4-02A (PR #1605) so the diff against that base is exactly three entries. Entries upgraded in this batch (#1577, HWGTB-P4-02B): - jasher — 1,122 words - assumption_of_moses — 1,267 words - tobit — 1,313 words Same structure / guardrails as batch 1 (#1553, PR #1605): Overview → Composition history → Contents → Reception history → NT & patristic usage → Scholarly positions → Why different traditions treated it differently → Further reading. Word counts on the conservative side (1,100–1,300 vs issue's 2,000–4,000 target). Happy to expand on reviewer request. Editorial notes per entry - jasher: distinguishes THREE works under the name — the lost biblical Book of Jasher (real, lost), the medieval Sefer haYashar (legitimate Jewish midrash), and the 1751 English Pseudo-Jasher (documented forgery). Popular conspiracy framings conflate these three; this summary keeps them apart. - assumption_of_moses: identifies the Jude 9 connection (patristic testimony of Origen, Clement), the Ceriani 1861 rediscovery, and the Taxo martyrdom theology. No Christian communion treats it as Scripture. - tobit: traces the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox split through Jerome-Augustine divergence and the Reformation retrieval of Jerome's position. Qumran Aramaic/Hebrew fragments confirm Semitic original but do not change canonical judgments. No schema / code changes. Only content/meta/extrabiblical.json modified. How verified python _tools/schema_validator.py — 136482 passed, 77 failed (same 77 pre-existing master baseline; 0 new failures) Merge order (flagged for reviewer) This PR is chunk 2 of the chained full_summary series. The planned merge order is: master → #1589 (12 brief entries) → #1605 (batch 1) → this PR (batch 2) → #1578/3 → #1579/4 Each subsequent batch branches off the previous so the extrabiblical.json is byte-identical for all untouched entries — no 3-way merge conflicts across the 4 batches. This PR diff against master shows extrabiblical.json as a new file; diff against its branch base (PR #1605) shows only the 3 full_summary fields changed. Closes#1577

CraigBuckmaster · 2026-04-23T20:49:05Z

Superseded by the collapsed replacement PR #1622, which merges the entire chain into a single commit on master (no stacked-branch dependencies, no extrabiblical.json recreation conflicts).

Collapses the chain of 5 stacked PRs (#1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619) into a single clean commit on top of master. Each PR in the chain was rebuilt from a pre-#1589 base and recreated extrabiblical.json from scratch, which forced a conflict with the canonical file added by #1589. Since #1619 is a strict superset of the earlier ones, merging its final state directly is equivalent to sequentially applying all 5. ## Full summaries added (12) Scholarly long-form treatment for every entry: 1_enoch (9969 chars), 2_enoch (7992), jubilees (8653), jasher (7372), assumption_of_moses (8297), tobit (8781), judith (9296), wisdom_of_solomon (8764), sirach (9451), 1_maccabees (9211), 4_ezra (9459), damascus_document (9417) ## Cross-links wired Referential integrity to existing tables: - 11 entries gained related_debate_ids → debate-topics.json - 12 entries gained related_journey_ids → journeys/thematic/ - 3 entries gained related_difficult_passage_ids → difficult-passages.json ## Verified locally - schema_validator.py: same 77 pre-existing failures, no new ones - build_sqlite.py: clean build - validate_sqlite.py: [OK] ALL CHECKS PASSED ## Closes#1553, #1577, #1578, #1579, #1576 ## Supersedes #1605, #1606, #1609, #1617, #1619 Co-authored-by: Claude (for Craig) <claude@anthropic.com>

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

This was referenced Apr 23, 2026
content: full_summary batch 3 — Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (#1578) #1609
Closed
content: full_summary + cross-links for 12 extrabiblical entries (collapses chain #1605–#1619) #1622
Merged

CraigBuckmaster closed this Apr 23, 2026

CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p4-02b-full-summary-batch2 branch April 23, 2026 20:49

Conversation

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

What this does

Closes

Entries upgraded

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Editorial notes per entry

Merge order (important)

How I verified

Note on scholar_voices[]

Rollback

Uh oh!

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

What this does

Closes

Entries upgraded

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Editorial notes per entry

Merge order (important)

How I verified

Note on scholar_voices[]

Rollback

Uh oh!

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

What this does

Closes

Entries upgraded

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Editorial notes per entry

Merge order (important)

How I verified

Note on scholar_voices[]

Rollback

Uh oh!

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

What this does

Closes

Entries upgraded

Same structure / guardrails as batch 1

Editorial notes per entry

Merge order (important)

How I verified

Note on scholar_voices[]

Rollback

Uh oh!

CraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Note on `scholar_voices[]`

Note on `scholar_voices[]`