content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616

Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged

content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

Conversation

@CraigBuckmaster

@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster commented Apr 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.

This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.

Content

10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:

ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance

Infrastructure changes

One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.

Two small updates to support it:

  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)

Closes

@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 23, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results

✅ All pipeline checks passed

StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed

Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report

✅ All content checks passed

Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)

Content Quality

ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail

2_peter 2

  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

2_timothy 3

  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

genesis 6

  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

hebrews 11

  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

john 10

  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

jude 1

  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

revelation 12

  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'

Content Accuracy

3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted

Generated by ci_content_check.py

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Apr 23, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

✅ All tests passed

PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470

Coverage

StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————

⏱️ Duration: 82.1s

@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster merged commit e868227 into masterApr 23, 2026
7 checks passed
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster deleted the feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2 branch April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592) - #1616
Merged
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Apr 23, 2026
Merged
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces #1592)#1616
CraigBuckmaster merged 2 commits into
masterfrom 
feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2
Conversation
@CraigBuckmaster
@CraigBuckmasterCraigBuckmaster
commented
Apr 23, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Replaces #1592 which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base; its diff against current master showed deletions of everything merged in prior rounds.
This branch cherry-picks the single content file onto current master.
Content
10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
ID
did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
trent-response-or-innovation
what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
Infrastructure changes
One position in who-are-the-nephilim uses second-temple as its tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.) distinct from the rabbinic-era jewish family.
Two small updates to support it:
  • app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple' to VALID_FAMILIES allowlist
  • app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple': '#D4A373' (sand/parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, visually distinct from rabbinic-era jewish green)
Closes
@claude
content: 10 debate topics on canon & extra-biblical questions (replaces 
93014bf
#1592)
Replaces #1592, which was built from a pre-Tier-2 base and had to
delete everything merged in prior rounds to rebase. Cherry-picks the
single content file onto current master.
Adds 10 topics covering canon-formation and extra-biblical debates:
- did-jude-affirm-enoch-as-scripture
- who-are-the-nephilim (introduces second-temple tradition_family)
- second-temple-literature-and-nt-theology
- dead-sea-scrolls-and-canon-questions
- jerome-vs-augustine-on-apocrypha
- trent-response-or-innovation
- what-criteria-at-hippo-carthage
- why-did-western-church-exclude-apocrypha
- why-does-ethiopia-have-a-different-canon
- athanasius-festal-letter-39-significance
## Infrastructure changes
One position in 'who-are-the-nephilim' uses 'second-temple' as its
tradition_family — a new family for positions anchored in Second
Temple Judaism reception (1 Enoch Watchers tradition, Jubilees, etc.)
distinct from the rabbinic-era 'jewish' family.
Infrastructure updates to support it:
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: added 'second-temple'
to VALID_FAMILIES
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: added 'second-temple' → #D4A373 (sand/
parchment tone evoking ancient manuscripts, distinct from the
rabbinic-era 'jewish' green)
Closes#1544. Supersedes #1592.
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Content Pipeline Results
✅ All pipeline checks passed
StepStatusDetails
Schema Validation✅137402 passed, 77 failed
Build DB✅—
DB Integrity✅101 passed, 0 failed
Content Pipeline — Quality & Accuracy Report
✅ All content checks passed
Scope: 7 chapter(s) across 7 book(s)
Content Quality
ChapterScoreGradeStatus
2_peter 290.2A✅
2_timothy 394.3A✅
genesis 696.5A✅
hebrews 1190.9A✅
john 1092.9A✅
jude 192.4A✅
revelation 1296.6A✅
Quality findings detail
2_peter 2
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
2_timothy 3
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
genesis 6
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
hebrews 11
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
john 10
  • verse_coverage: Only 2 section(s) for 42 verses (21 verses/section)
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
jude 1
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
revelation 12
  • relevance: Unknown panel key 'st2'
Content Accuracy
3490 claims checked — 138 verified, 0 flagged, 0 refuted
Generated by ci_content_check.py
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Apr 23, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Test Results
✅ All tests passed
PassedFailedTotal
Tests✅ 3482❌ 03482
Suites✅ 470❌ 0470
Coverage
StatementsBranchesFunctionsLines
————
⏱️ Duration: 82.1s
@claude
fix: add orthodox to VALID_FAMILIES + color map
04f0783
The debate-topics content also uses 'orthodox' as a tradition_family
for Eastern Orthodox positions. Missed in the initial pass.
- app/__tests__/unit/debateTopicData.test.ts: add 'orthodox'
- app/src/theme/colors.ts: add orthodox → #B85C5C (deeper liturgical red)
@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
merged commit e868227
into
masterApr 23, 2026

7 checks passed

@CraigBuckmaster
CraigBuckmaster
deleted the

feature/hwgtb-p1-07-canon-debate-topics-v2

branch
April 23, 2026 20:35
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@CraigBuckmaster@claude