Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Some Thoughts

Albert Wang edited this page Apr 28, 2017 · 1 revision

Just some random thoughts.

#__ Although this framework starts as almost a joke which I told myself, "Hey, let me write a framework to learn HTTP2 and coroutine in the same time", I now think some valuable parts exists in this framework.

0. Learning

I am writing this framework for the sake of learning. Of course it will be amazing if many people eventually use this framework in production, but I don't really mind if nobody uses in production.

It's not meant to replace any existing technologies and also writing a production level framework is a huge engineering task which can not completed by me alone. I merely have just used Python for 2 years and been using Python intensively for 1 year.

But, by writing this framework, I will become a much better developer.

Actually, I hope my users do this too. Just clone this project and start to hack it. It's fun.

1. HTTP2

If, HTTP2 will become mainstream, then a HTTP2 built-in framework will be useful. However, I am not doing WSIG at all. I don't even know what are the WSIG interfaces. I am not sure if we will have a HTTP2 standard interface in Python community in the near future. Again, I have very little knowledge and experience in Web. I don't even know if what I am doing is funny or ridiculous for some other people.

2. Async Programming. I mean, Coroutine Programming.

If you care about performance and concurrency, you should start to care about coroutine. But, to be honest, sync code is not that but. Actually, what I want is to provide end users a super clean API so that they don't even bother to think about async. Is it possible?

3. Replaceable Framework Parts

H2 is amazing. It is a network protocol library which doesn't do IO. Does that sounds crazy? But yeah!!!!!!!!

That's the library I am looking for. This is the right way to write protocol libraries. A protocol is at its core offline, it's just a belief of that the remote should be. It should not actually do IO.

If you are writing a letter to your friend, do you send the letter to your friend by your self? Of course not!

If you send the letter by running to his home, why do you want to write a letter at the first place?!

Clone this wiki locally