Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
docs: translate AUTHORING.md to Spanish - #139
Conversation
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in:28 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughSe añadió una guía completa en español para la autoría y el mantenimiento de plantillas y extensiones CPA. Incluye configuración, convenciones, compatibilidad, calidad, tipado, registro, generación y pruebas locales. ChangesGuía de autoría en español
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/AUTHORING.es.md`:
- Around line 424-440: Corrige el flujo documentado alrededor de la generación
de `my-app`: establece `CI=true` y usa `--no-interactive` en lugar de depender
de `--yes`, entra en el directorio del proyecto generado antes de ejecutar las
validaciones y conserva allí los comandos `uv sync`, `uv run ruff check .` y `uv
run pytest`.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ulises-jeremias
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review: ✅ Approve
Solid translation — the structure mirrors AUTHORING.md well and covers all the key concepts: template layout, cpa.config.json, Jinja2 variables, extensions, pyproject.toml deep-merge, naming conventions, quality bar, and local testing.
CI
All checks pass ✅. The second commit (70f482f) already fixed the local testing flow that CodeRabbit flagged (adding CI=true, --no-interactive, and cd my-app).
One thing to address before merge
Copy-paste reference to cna-templates in the header (line 3):
Guía para colaboradores que quieran añadir o actualizar plantillas y extensiones en `cpa-templates`. Referencia de compatibilidad: `cna-templates AUTHORING.md`.The phrase Referencia de compatibilidad: cna-templates AUTHORING.md looks like a carry-over from the sister project cna-templates. In the context of this file, it's either:
- A reference to the original English doc it was translated from — in which case it should say
cpa-templates AUTHORING.md(or justAUTHORING.md), or - An intentional cross-project note — in which case it should be made explicit (e.g., "esta guía sigue la misma estructura que
cna-templates/AUTHORING.md").
Either way, cna-templates AUTHORING.md as written is ambiguous and might confuse contributors who land on this file directly.
Minor observations (non-blocking)
- The code fence on line ~55 uses
```on one line and closes with```correctly — looks fine after the second commit. - The translation quality is good throughout. Technical terms like
StrictUndefined,pyproject.toml,cpa.config.json,uv syncare correctly left untranslated, which is the right call. - The contributor checklists and examples are a nice addition that aren't in the English version.
Fix the cna-templates reference and this is merge-ready.
👋 Great first contribution! Come join our community Discord where Spanish-speaking contributors are always welcome: Join the Discord — quick questions, coordination, and translation discussions all happen there.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Adds a Spanish translation of the AUTHORING documentation to help Spanish-speaking contributors understand how templates and extensions work.
Changes:
Testing:
Documentation-only change. No code changes were made.
Summary by CodeRabbit