[Feature Request] Add support for `IAsyncEnumerable` (`QueryUnbufferedAsync`) on all .NET targets

[julealgon]

Currently, IAsyncEnumerable support is conditioned on .NET5 or greater. For example:

Dapper/Dapper/SqlMapper.Async.cs

Lines 1252 to 1347 in 6434c69

	#if NET5_0_OR_GREATER
	/// <summary>
	/// Execute a query asynchronously using <see cref="IAsyncEnumerable{dynamic}"/>.
	/// </summary>
	/// <param name="cnn">The connection to query on.</param>
	/// <param name="sql">The SQL to execute for the query.</param>
	/// <param name="param">The parameters to pass, if any.</param>
	/// <param name="transaction">The transaction to use, if any.</param>
	/// <param name="commandTimeout">The command timeout (in seconds).</param>
	/// <param name="commandType">The type of command to execute.</param>
	/// <returns>
	/// A sequence of data of dynamic data
	/// </returns>
	public static IAsyncEnumerable<dynamic> QueryUnbufferedAsync(this DbConnection cnn, string sql, object? param = null, DbTransaction? transaction = null, int? commandTimeout = null, CommandType? commandType = null)
	{
	// note: in many cases of adding a new async method I might add a CancellationToken - however, cancellation is expressed via WithCancellation on iterators
	return QueryUnbufferedAsync<dynamic>(cnn, typeof(object), new CommandDefinition(sql, param, transaction, commandTimeout, commandType, CommandFlags.None, default));
	}
	/// <summary>
	/// Execute a query asynchronously using <see cref="IAsyncEnumerable{T}"/>.
	/// </summary>
	/// <typeparam name="T">The type of results to return.</typeparam>
	/// <param name="cnn">The connection to query on.</param>
	/// <param name="sql">The SQL to execute for the query.</param>
	/// <param name="param">The parameters to pass, if any.</param>
	/// <param name="transaction">The transaction to use, if any.</param>
	/// <param name="commandTimeout">The command timeout (in seconds).</param>
	/// <param name="commandType">The type of command to execute.</param>
	/// <returns>
	/// A sequence of data of <typeparamref name="T"/>; if a basic type (int, string, etc) is queried then the data from the first column is assumed, otherwise an instance is
	/// created per row, and a direct column-name===member-name mapping is assumed (case insensitive).
	/// </returns>
	public static IAsyncEnumerable<T> QueryUnbufferedAsync<T>(this DbConnection cnn, string sql, object? param = null, DbTransaction? transaction = null, int? commandTimeout = null, CommandType? commandType = null)
	{
	// note: in many cases of adding a new async method I might add a CancellationToken - however, cancellation is expressed via WithCancellation on iterators
	return QueryUnbufferedAsync<T>(cnn, typeof(T), new CommandDefinition(sql, param, transaction, commandTimeout, commandType, CommandFlags.None, default));
	}
	private static IAsyncEnumerable<T> QueryUnbufferedAsync<T>(this IDbConnection cnn, Type effectiveType, CommandDefinition command)
	{
	return Impl(cnn, effectiveType, command, command.CancellationToken); // proxy to allow CT expression
	static async IAsyncEnumerable<T> Impl(IDbConnection cnn, Type effectiveType, CommandDefinition command,
	[EnumeratorCancellation] CancellationToken cancel)
	{
	object? param = command.Parameters;
	var identity = new Identity(command.CommandText, command.CommandTypeDirect, cnn, effectiveType, param?.GetType());
	var info = GetCacheInfo(identity, param, command.AddToCache);
	bool wasClosed = cnn.State == ConnectionState.Closed;
	using var cmd = command.TrySetupAsyncCommand(cnn, info.ParamReader);
	DbDataReader? reader = null;
	try
	{
	if (wasClosed) await cnn.TryOpenAsync(cancel).ConfigureAwait(false);
	reader = await ExecuteReaderWithFlagsFallbackAsync(cmd, wasClosed, CommandBehavior.SequentialAccess | CommandBehavior.SingleResult, cancel).ConfigureAwait(false);
	var tuple = info.Deserializer;
	int hash = GetColumnHash(reader);
	if (tuple.Func is null || tuple.Hash != hash)
	{
	if (reader.FieldCount == 0)
	{
	yield break;
	}
	tuple = info.Deserializer = new DeserializerState(hash, GetDeserializer(effectiveType, reader, 0, -1, false));
	if (command.AddToCache) SetQueryCache(identity, info);
	}
	var func = tuple.Func;
	var convertToType = Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(effectiveType) ?? effectiveType;
	while (await reader.ReadAsync(cancel).ConfigureAwait(false))
	{
	object val = func(reader);
	yield return GetValue<T>(reader, effectiveType, val);
	}
	while (await reader.NextResultAsync(cancel).ConfigureAwait(false)) { /* ignore subsequent result sets */ }
	command.OnCompleted();
	}
	finally
	{
	if (reader is not null)
	{
	if (!reader.IsClosed)
	{
	try { cmd?.Cancel(); }
	catch { /* don't spoil any existing exception */ }
	}
	await reader.DisposeAsync();
	}
	if (wasClosed) cnn.Close();
	}
	}
	}
	#endif

However, there shouldn't be any reason not to support IAsyncEnumerable on every target currently supported by Dapper, since there exists a well-maintained BCL package that adds the interface on older frameworks:

• https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces

To allow for IAsyncEnumerable to work everywhere, it would just be a matter of including a dependency on the package above for the netstandard2.0 and net462 targets. This approach is used heavily by other libraries for this exact same purpose.

We currently have a solution that targets NET472 and we wanted to be able to tap into IAsyncEnumerable in a couple of places where we are currently being forced to use Task<IEnumerable<T>> methods such as QueryAsync.

Could there be an update to the library that adds support for the IAsyncEnumerable-returning methods for all frameworks based on the above suggestion?

[mgravell]

I'm very aware of the package, and use it extensively in some other libs. I'll try to do a quick "do any wheels fall off?" check, probably this weekend.

I know it isn't always easy or fast to do, but I also do strongly recommend updating to modern .NET; having net472 as a target is becoming increasingly limiting - something I've opined on at length here: https://blog.marcgravell.com/2020/01/net-core-net-5-exodus-of-net-framework.html

[julealgon]

I'll try to do a quick "do any wheels fall off?" check, probably this weekend.

Awesome to hear! Hopefully that goes well.

I know it isn't always easy or fast to do, but I also do strongly recommend updating to modern .NET; having net472 as a target is becoming increasingly limiting - something I've opined on at length here: https://blog.marcgravell.com/2020/01/net-core-net-5-exodus-of-net-framework.html

Yep, I'm 100% with you on this. We have a ~20-year-old solution that we are trying to migrate for a while now, but there is a ton of technical debt in the way and some blockers such as a few ASP.NET WebForms projects that can only go up to .NET 4.8.... It will happen for sure, but it might take a couple years for all of the projects to be migrated if I'm being honest.

This is why we would be able to reap the benefits of this change in the meantime. If we were going to migrate right away, I would likely not have proposed this one.

[mgravell]

2.1.66