Skip to content

Add article: DuckDB in production — what it's actually good at (and what it isn't) - #57

Open
arshadansari27 wants to merge 1 commit into
Data-Engineering-Weekly:mainfrom
arshadansari27:add-duckdb-in-production
Open

Add article: DuckDB in production — what it's actually good at (and what it isn't)#57
arshadansari27 wants to merge 1 commit into
Data-Engineering-Weekly:mainfrom
arshadansari27:add-duckdb-in-production

Conversation

@arshadansari27

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Submitting one article for consideration, following the template in the README.

Article:https://hikmahtechnologies.com/blog/duckdb-in-production-what-its-good-at/

It's an operator's account of where DuckDB fits in production and where it doesn't, written from systems I run rather than from benchmarks — the three deployment patterns that hold up, the anti-pattern behind most "DuckDB is unreliable" posts, and a limitations section covering single-process writes, the missing governance layer, and memory and spill behaviour.

Vendor-neutral: I'm not selling DuckDB or anything built on it, and the post is as direct about where it's the wrong choice as where it isn't.

Thanks for curating the newsletter — it's a genuinely useful read each week.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@arshadansari27