Skip to content

Increase SCA vulnerability test coverage - #11785

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
bdu/sca-appsec-coverage
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

Increase SCA vulnerability test coverage#11785
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
bdu/sca-appsec-coverage

Conversation

@bric3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

Expands the test coverage for SCA (Software Composition Analysis) vulnerabilities.

Motivation

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

  • Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
  • Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
  • Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
    Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
  • Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
  • Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
  • Add your completed PR to the merge queue by commenting /merge. You can also:
    • Customize the commit message associated with the merge with /merge --commit-message "..."
    • Remove your PR from the merge queue with /merge -c
    • Skip all merge queue checks with /merge -f --reason "reason"; please use this judiciously, as some checks do not run at the PR-level (note: the PR still needs to be mergeable, this will only skip the pre-merge build)
    • Get more information in this doc

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

@bric3
bric3 requested a review from a team as a code ownerJune 29, 2026 16:20
@dd-octo-sts

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! 👋 Thanks for your pull request! 🎉

To help us review it, please make sure to:

  • Add at least one type, and one component or instrumentation label to the pull request

If you need help, please check our contributing guidelines.

@bric3bric3 added type: bug fix Bug fix tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes comp: tooling Build & Tooling labels Jun 29, 2026

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DDAlexeyKuznetsov-DD left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left minor comments.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-stsBot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

SuiteStatus
Startup🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
ScenarioCandidatemasterΔ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent14.79 s14.63 s[+0.2%; +2.0%] (maybe worse)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent13.62 s13.70 s[-1.1%; +0.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent16.92 s16.74 s[+0.2%; +1.9%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent16.48 s16.95 s[-7.0%; +1.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent16.84 s16.92 s[-1.3%; +0.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent16.96 s16.82 s[-0.2%; +1.9%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent16.08 s16.13 s[-1.2%; +0.5%] (no difference)

Commit:e608fd46 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@bric3
bric3force-pushed the bdu/sca-appsec-coverage branch from e66206d to 3d56b60CompareJune 29, 2026 20:10

@jandro996jandro996 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nits

dd-java-agent/appsec/src/test/java/com/datadog/appsec/sca/ScaReachabilityMethodLevelTest.java:46
nit: static class could be enough here

dd-java-agent/appsec/src/test/java/com/datadog/appsec/sca/ScaCveDatabaseTest.java:129
nit: two independent behaviors in one test method (immutability + version matching), but good enough

@jandro996jandro996 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for take care of this!

@bric3
bric3force-pushed the bdu/sca-appsec-coverage branch from 516b25a to 0104ebbCompareJune 30, 2026 08:41
@bric3
bric3 enabled auto-merge June 30, 2026 08:49
@bric3
bric3 added this pull request to the merge queueJun 30, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-06-30 09:44:31 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-06-30 09:44:35 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 2h (p90).


2026-06-30 11:08:29 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queueBot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 30, 2026
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854dBot merged commit 8df9f05 into masterJun 30, 2026
777 of 780 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854dBot deleted the bdu/sca-appsec-coverage branch June 30, 2026 11:08
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jun 30, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: toolingBuild & Toolingtag: no release notesChanges to exclude from release notestype: bug fixBug fix

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@bric3@manuel-alvarez-alvarez@jandro996@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD