Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
added IDCC impact proof focal use case - #12
Open
jandrieu wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
| The new funders have shown low confidence in the authenticity of the data, which shows that 99.9% of the beneficiaries improved in health in only 6 months since enrolling in iHealth. Shang-Chi thus needs to ensure the organization’s impact accountability to its funders. The data (reported by the beneficiaries) against the intended outcomes need to be validated. | ||
| To do so, the manager uses a platform to allow him to ensure the authenticity of the data submitter (beneficiary) and know the time and date of the data submission. The manager also has the ability to validate the credibility of the outcome data based on external evidence (e.g. photos, documents - offchain data). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the manager == Shang-Chi?
Suggest use Shang-Chi throughout
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I also have some difficulty with "ensure the authenticity", but that might just be me.
Could "provide assurance over the authenticity." or "guarantee the authenticity" be better?
| ## Scenario | ||
| Shang-Chi collects data about the health of beneficiaries who joined iHealth. He sends standard survey forms through the platform to target beneficiaries weekly, which data are then submitted back to Shang-Chi with evidence attached (e.g. photos of blood pressure records and weight measurement). Having all this information associated with the data, Shang-Chi then evaluates the data submitted and approves each submission record by signing on it (digitally). These validated data are incorporated into the reports to funder, which will be auditable, accountable, and traceable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"...platform to target beneficiaries weekly, which data are"
Should it be ", whose data"
| ## Artifacts | ||
| ### Verifiable Credentials | ||
| * **Health surveys** - created by beneficiaries and verified by Shang-chi upon assessing attached supporting documents along health surveys. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shang-Chi thoughout. Shang-chi in some places
alwyn-ixo
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2022
alwyn-ixo
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Forcing the merge - can no longer wait for comment reviews.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In support of issue #4