Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Add updater workflow by Hazmi35 · Pull Request #41 · Erisa/cloudflared-docker · GitHub
Skip to content

Add updater workflow - #41

Open
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow
Open

Add updater workflow#41
Hazmi35 wants to merge 1 commit into
Erisa:mainfrom
hzmifork:workflow

Conversation

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds an automatic workflow to keep CLOUDFLARED_VERSION updated. It checks the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared every 6 hours (and can be run manually), then opens a PR if a newer version is found.

It only supports one update at a time though, maybe make it just directly commit to main? There's a Cloudflared version that we missed. 2026.2.0

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings March 9, 2026 17:11

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically keep the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION variable in docker-bake.hcl up to date. The workflow runs on a schedule (every 6 hours) and can also be triggered manually; it fetches the latest release tag from cloudflare/cloudflared and opens an automated PR if a newer version is found.

Changes:

  • Adds a new scheduled GitHub Actions workflow that checks for the latest cloudflare/cloudflared release
  • Parses and updates the CLOUDFLARED_VERSION default value in docker-bake.hcl using awk
  • Opens a PR via peter-evans/create-pull-request if the version has changed

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +24 to +35
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});

if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}

core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease() API call can throw an exception (e.g., an HTTP 404 if there are no releases, or a network error), which would cause the step to fail with an unhandled error rather than a clean core.setFailed message. The if (!release?.data?.tag_name) guard only handles cases where the call succeeds but returns unexpected data — it doesn't catch errors thrown during the API call. Wrapping the call in a try/catch block and calling core.setFailed(error.message) in the catch handler would make error handling more robust and the failure message more informative.

Suggested change
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
try {
const release = await github.rest.repos.getLatestRelease({
owner: 'cloudflare',
repo: 'cloudflared'
});
if (!release?.data?.tag_name) {
core.setFailed('Failed to resolve cloudflared release tag');
return;
}
core.setOutput('latest_tag', release.data.tag_name);
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error && error.message ? error.message : String(error));
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +76 to +78
echo "changed=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "current_version=$current_version" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "new_version=$LATEST_TAG" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Writing externally controlled values directly into $GITHUB_OUTPUT using echo "key=$value" is a known GitHub Actions security concern. If $LATEST_TAG or $current_version contains a newline character (e.g., a maliciously crafted release tag), it could inject additional key=value pairs into $GITHUB_OUTPUT, potentially influencing downstream steps. The recommended mitigation is to use a multi-line delimiter approach with a random delimiter (the EOF pattern using $GITHUB_OUTPUT with heredoc syntax), for example:

echo "new_version<<EOF
$LATEST_TAG
EOF" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

But more practically, since these values should be single-line version strings, adding an explicit newline/whitespace check before writing would be a sufficient guard.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +80 to +93
- name: Create pull request
if: steps.update.outputs.changed == 'true'
uses: peter-evans/create-pull-request@v6
with:
branch: chore/update-cloudflared-${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}
commit-message: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
title: "chore: update cloudflared to ${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}"
body: |
Automated update of `CLOUDFLARED_VERSION` in `docker-bake.hcl`.

- Previous version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.current_version }}`
- New version: `${{ steps.update.outputs.new_version }}`

Source: `cloudflare/cloudflared` latest GitHub release tag.

CopilotAIMar 9, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, pull requests created by peter-evans/create-pull-request will not trigger other GitHub Actions workflows (like docker-build.yml). This is a deliberate GitHub security restriction to prevent recursive workflow runs. Since the docker-build.yml workflow runs on every PR, the automated PR created by this workflow won't have CI checks run against it unless a person with write access closes and reopens the PR, or pushes a new commit to the branch. To make CI trigger automatically, a Personal Access Token (PAT) or a GitHub App token should be passed via the token parameter of this action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can bypass this by setting docker-build to also be triggerable by workflow dispatch and running gh workflow run on the branch after the PR is made

https://github.com/Erisa/Cliptok/blob/68f6651f3423b4f00b4e460b2794157ffe4530ff/.github/workflows/append-lists-txt.yml#L53

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

@Erisa

Erisa commented Mar 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That testing could probably be automated nowadays though, I just don't feel like doing it myself. I build the image with docker bake, run it with --hello-world and then request the resulting tunnel URL several times to make sure it works.

@Hazmi35

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

maybe make it just directly commit to main

I manually test every new version before I merge it to main, there have been several new versions which justified this practice because of various changes they made upstream with no regard for my image

I see, then keep with the PR approach

@Erisa
Erisa self-requested a review March 12, 2026 04:26
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Hazmi35@Erisa