Invisible Lan fredir.exe fails control-break lookup

[PerditionC]

It took me a while, but this issue is that in procsupt.asm the kernel builds on the stack a return and int23h so we can properly pass the correct stack between handler and C code. Invisible Lan fredir.exe does a check to verify and find the kernel's code that invokes the int 23h when a control-break occurs. It installs its own handler then causes a control-C to invoke it, and it saves the return address. Then it cleans up some (it redirected stdout to avoid showing the ^C on the console) which overwrites the [unused] stack in the process which overwrites the data at the address previously saved. Then it checks the address returned to verify the previous instruction was int 23h, however, by now that call stack has been overwritten the int 23h instruction so the check fails and the redir aborts loading. There is secondary issues with ctrl-break handling as the ^C is printed to the CON device when it should be redirected to NUL device. The NUL device also misses checking for control-break when output since it just immediately returns success.

The relevant code in fredir.exe (note: original executable is some form of lzexe compressed)

 ; ... setup and invoke control-break, cleanup, and now check if we found kernel's int 23h call site
 mov dx, OFFSET errormsg
 cmp word [cs:0x44], 2 ; memory 0x44 & 0x46 initialized to 0x02 when exe loaded, now iret return address
 jb .ctrlbreak_return
 les bx, [cs:0x44]
 cmp word [es:bx - 2], 0x23cd ; <-- succeeds in MSDOS, by now overwritten in FD kernel since was on stack
 jne .ctrlbreak_return
 xor dx, dx ; success
.ctrlbreak_return:
 pop ax
 pop bx
 pop cx
 pop si
 pop di
 pop bp
 pop ds
 pop es
 ret

; transient INT 23h handler: capture DOS return CS:IP
ctrlbreak_handler:
 pop word [cs:0x44] 
 pop word [cs:0x46]
 push word [cs:0x46]
 push word [cs:0x44]
 iret

In kernel procsupt.asm chunk of _spawn_int23 call:

 		sub sp, byte 8		;; code piece needs 7 bytes --> 4 words
 		push ss			;; prepare jump to INT-23 via RETF
 		push bp			;; will be offset / temp: saved BP
 		mov bp, sp
 		add bp, byte 4		;; position BP onto INT-23
 		mov word [bp], 23cdh		;; INT 23h
 		mov byte [bp+2], 9ah			;; CALL FAR immediate
 		mov word [bp+3], ??regain_control_int23
 		mov word [bp+5], cs

 		;; complete the jump to INT-23 via RETF and restore BP
 		xchg word [bp-4], bp

 		clc			;; set default action --> resume
 		; invoke the int 23 handler its address has been constructed
 		;; on the stack
 		retf

??regain_control_int23:

So we need to rework this so the int 23h call is in static [patchable] location and not on stack.

[ecm-pushbx]

In MS-DOS and lDOS, the int 23h instruction runs on the same stack as the interrupt 21h DOS handler, which necessitates that it be placed somewhere other than an on-stack trampoline. In lDOS, this is a small handler in DOSDATA. Quoth an fdpp discussion:

I think this is probably an attempt to implement the retf vs retf 2 vs iret semantics of calling int 23h. However, it is incorrect in that the int 23h is supposed to run on the original int 21h stack, which is why lDOS put the int 23h caller into DOSDATA so that it can access DOS variables using cs: overrides: https://hg.pushbx.org/ecm/msdos4/file/fdd6a0a0fcac/src/DOS/ctrlc.nas#l313

The fact that int 23h runs with the int 21h stack frame isn't directly listed in the interrupt list: https://fd.lod.bz/rbil/interrup/dos_kernel/23.html#4153

[ecm-pushbx]

Also, lDOS does use stdout to write the ^C string:

bufout call in ctrlc.nas, bufout entry in cpmio2.nas which calls outt defined in the same file. This calls rawout. Defined in cpmio.nas which writes to the SFT associated with process handle 1, possibly using int 29h

[PerditionC]

To be clear, Invisible Lan opens NUL device, dup2 handle 1 (stdout) to NUL handle it opened, so when ^C printed to handle 1 it is supposed to be printed to NUL device but FD kernel actually prints to CON device not stdout (its more complex, it may or may not use a handle), but in this case it does not.

[ecm-pushbx]

Yes, I got that. My prior message was to confirm it goes to stdout in lDOS (and thus MS-DOS v4.01 too).

[PerditionC]

:-) I got that, was just clarifying for my future self

[PerditionC]

weird repeat of my message, I think but need to study the code some more that fd kernel should use handle 1 if no handle provided instead of CON device directly, but control break handling has a 1b handler like msdos that's not used and one that sets/uses bios data area flag, so the whole handling needs some reworking.

[PerditionC]

Ctrl-break moved off stack, still need to work on output. May just punt and use stdout handle if no handle provided instead of pdev.