Skip to content

Don't even suggest removing async on overrides - #76

Merged
ejball merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ejball/ide0391-none
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

Don't even suggest removing async on overrides#76
ejball merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
ejball/ide0391-none

Conversation

@ejball

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

At least with non-overrides the author could consider making the method synchronous.

At least with non-overrides the author could consider making the method synchronous.
@bgrainger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Runtime async will probably make both IDE0390 and IDE0391 obsolete, but we certainly don't need IDE0391 right now. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ide0390-ide0391

@ejball
ejball merged commit 8c3c309 into masterAug 24, 2026
5 checks passed
@ejball
ejball deleted the ejball/ide0391-none branch August 24, 2026 14:37
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ejball@bgrainger