You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Finish the RP2350 and RP2350W hardware bring-up on the currently available Pico 2 W fixture, using the existing AutoResearch/fbuild path and the board's soldered two-pin feedback bridge.
The 2026-08-18 inventory shows:
historical RP2350W CDC identity: COM17, 2E8A:F00F, serial 2DCB876B587EA334; Windows currently reports this saved record as health=phantom selectable=no, so current physical enumeration still must be established;
healthy Espressif peer: COM9, 303A:1001, serial 8C:BF:EA:CF:87:B4; the USB PID is shared, so firmware-level chip detection must confirm ESP32-C6 before peer tests;
Most source-side RP2350W foundation work has landed: board/deploy support, PIO0/1/2 channel selection, serial RPC, watchdog recovery, CYW43 networking, peer HTTP/JSON-RPC, OTA staging, and btstack BLE transport. What remains is a single evidence-backed closeout of every driver and subsystem reachable with the attached hardware.
Proposal
Re-establish the RP2350W through fbuild port scan and the normal RP BOOTSEL/CDC deployment path. Do not pin a stale COM17 record; omit --upload-port unless multiple RP boards are actually present, or use UF2=<volume> if the board is deliberately in BOOTSEL.
Run GPIO-only AutoResearch with pin discovery and record the physically observed bridge. The historical GPIO0 -> GPIO1 note is a hypothesis until the current firmware reports it.
Validate both rp2350 and rp2350w profiles on the Pico 2 W so common silicon support and W-specific transports are separately covered.
Exercise every RP driver reachable with the discovered bridge through the public FastLED/Channels API where available:
PIO0, PIO1, and RP2350-only PIO2 clockless TX with PIO RX byte/edge evidence;
UART clockless output on any hardware UART route compatible with the discovered bridge (GPIO0 -> GPIO1 is UART0 TX/RX);
AUTO and BIT_BANG fallback behavior through the user-facing API;
arbitrary-pin PIO SPI if the harness supports capture on the bridge;
fixed-function SPI0/SPI1 and APA102/SK9822 only when the present wiring can form the required MOSI -> MISO route; otherwise record the exact pin incompatibility as not reachable in this fixture, not as a pass.
A focused RED -> GREEN repro is recorded for every source/harness gap discovered while enabling RP2350 HIL (including any RP2040-only CLI restriction that must be generalized).
fbuild port scan records the live RP board identity/port and the healthy peer identity; firmware-level detection confirms the peer chip before ESP32-C6 use.
AutoResearch live pin discovery reports the soldered pair and testGpioConnection proves LOW/HIGH feedback; no pin mapping is accepted from historical notes alone.
The rp2350 and rp2350w build/deploy/serial RPC paths both pass on the attached Pico 2 W.
PIO0, PIO1, and PIO2 each produce decisive byte/edge loopback evidence through the public driver path.
PIO0 + PIO1 simultaneous execution passes without resource collision, stale state machine, or DMA ownership leak.
Every UART, SPI, AUTO, BIT_BANG, and PIO-SPI path physically reachable with the discovered bridge is tested; every unreachable path is listed with the exact wiring/peripheral constraint.
RP2350W RPC smoke, IEEE-754, SIMD, watchdog/reconnect, concurrency, and Wave2D gates pass or produce a concrete tracked implementation gap.
RP2350W <-> ESP32-C6 peer HTTP/JSON-RPC, >=4 KiB payloads in both directions, ten reconnect cycles, BLE GATT, and OTA recovery pass when the peer is firmware-confirmed as C6.
Closeout records the exact commands, commits, wiring, ports, VID:PIDs/serials, and decisive REMOTE:/RESULT: lines.
No raw flasher, raw pyserial path, one-off sketch, host-WiFi switch, guessed register map, or unsupported-peripheral shim is introduced.
Relevant lint, focused tests, RP2350/RP2350W builds, code review, PR delivery, and post-merge live rerun are complete.
Decisions
Treat the attached Pico 2 W as both the RP2350 common-silicon DUT and the RP2350W transport DUT; this covers both profiles without pretending a second board exists.
Treat prior GPIO0 -> GPIO1 documentation as a lead only; live discovery is the authority for the current physical bridge.
Count a driver as complete only with live feedback evidence through the normal API. Compile-only or raw peripheral evidence is supporting evidence, not closeout.
Mark physically unreachable fixed-pin routes explicitly rather than changing soldered wiring or inferring success.
Open questions
Which present USB node/BOOTSEL volume belongs to the Pico 2 W after the user-reported reattachment? The saved COM17 record is not currently present, so this must be resolved from a fresh scan/deploy result.
Whether the current two-pin bridge permits any fixed-function SPI route depends on the live-discovered pins; the historical GPIO0/GPIO1 pair supports UART0 and arbitrary-pin PIO tests but not the canonical SPI0/1 MOSI -> MISO pairs.
Context
Finish the RP2350 and RP2350W hardware bring-up on the currently available Pico 2 W fixture, using the existing AutoResearch/fbuild path and the board's soldered two-pin feedback bridge.
The 2026-08-18 inventory shows:
2E8A:F00F, serial2DCB876B587EA334; Windows currently reports this saved record ashealth=phantom selectable=no, so current physical enumeration still must be established;303A:1001, serial8C:BF:EA:CF:87:B4; the USB PID is shared, so firmware-level chip detection must confirm ESP32-C6 before peer tests;findConnectedPins/GPIO evidence before relying on it.Most source-side RP2350W foundation work has landed: board/deploy support, PIO0/1/2 channel selection, serial RPC, watchdog recovery, CYW43 networking, peer HTTP/JSON-RPC, OTA staging, and btstack BLE transport. What remains is a single evidence-backed closeout of every driver and subsystem reachable with the attached hardware.
Proposal
fbuild port scanand the normal RP BOOTSEL/CDC deployment path. Do not pin a stale COM17 record; omit--upload-portunless multiple RP boards are actually present, or useUF2=<volume>if the board is deliberately in BOOTSEL.rp2350andrp2350wprofiles on the Pico 2 W so common silicon support and W-specific transports are separately covered.Acceptance criteria
fbuild port scanrecords the live RP board identity/port and the healthy peer identity; firmware-level detection confirms the peer chip before ESP32-C6 use.testGpioConnectionproves LOW/HIGH feedback; no pin mapping is accepted from historical notes alone.rp2350andrp2350wbuild/deploy/serial RPC paths both pass on the attached Pico 2 W.REMOTE:/RESULT:lines.Decisions
Open questions
Related issues