Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-atomic write to the shared cache file can race under parallel runs.
The "idempotent" reasoning in the comment covers content equality, but
std::fs::writetruncates then writes, so it is not atomic. Sinceavr8js_cacheis a process-global shared directory, a second concurrent run truncating<cache>/headless.mjswhile a first run'snodeis still reading it during startup can expose an empty or partial script (transientSyntaxError/ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND). Writing to a sibling temp file and atomically renaming avoids the partial-read window.🛡️ Proposed atomic write
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents