Skip to content

more direct way of handling Future success/fail #412

Description

@tomholub

It's similarly weird to use map if we are talking about a single Future executing one time with a single failure or success. Map implies working with array of potentially many items, which seems a mismatch for what we're doing (even if this is otherwise common in iOS development).

I'll merge this but file a separate issue.

Originally posted by @tomholub in #410 (comment)

 return getPubKeys(for: recipients)
.mapError { ComposeMessageError.validationError($0) }
.map { allRecipientPubs in
let replyToMimeMsg = input.replyToMime
.flatMap { String(data: $0, encoding: .utf8) }
return SendableMsg(
text: text,
to: recipients.map(\.email),
cc: [],
bcc: [],
from: email,
subject: subject,
replyToMimeMsg: replyToMimeMsg,
atts: atts,
pubKeys: allRecipientPubs + [myPubKey]
)
}
}

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions