Fail for invalid parameters

[seisman]

Description of the problem

We should be more careful to pass unrecognized keyword parameters to gmt command.

Full code that generated the error

import gmt

# Load sample earthquake data in a pandas.DataFrame
quakes = gmt.datasets.load_usgs_quakes()

# Load the builtin Earth relief grid as an xarray.DataArray.
relief = gmt.datasets.load_earth_relief(resolution="30m")

# The Figure object controls all plotting functions
fig = gmt.Figure()
# Setup a map with a global region, a Mollweide projection, and automatic ticks
fig.basemap(region="g", projection="W200/8i", frame=True)
# Plot the Earth relief grid in pseudo-color.
fig.grdimage(relief, cmap="geo")
# Plot earthquakes as circles. Size maps to magnitude and color to depth.
fig.plot(x=quakes.longitude, y=quakes.latitude, sizes=0.01*2**quakes.mag,
 colors=quakes.depth/quakes.depth.max(), cmap="viridis", style="cc")
# Show a preview of the image (inline if in a Jupyter notebook).
fig.show()

The code above is the same as the code on gmt-python's homepage, except that in fig.plot(), I use the keyword colors instead of color. I know it's a user's mistake, but gmt-python reports some strange errors, which is very confusing.

Full error message

gmt-python-session [ERROR]: Current panel has row or column outsiden range!
psxy [ERROR]: Found no history for option -c
[Session gmt-python-session (9)]: Error returned from GMT API: GMT_OPTION_HISTORY_ERROR (63)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GMTCLibError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-1-5a482bf0dd97> in <module>()
 15 # Plot earthquakes as circles. Size maps to magnitude and color to depth.
 16 fig.plot(x=quakes.longitude, y=quakes.latitude, sizes=0.01*2**quakes.mag,
---> 17 colors=quakes.depth/quakes.depth.max(), cmap="viridis", style="cc")
 18 # Show a preview of the image (inline if in a Jupyter notebook).
 19 fig.show()

~/Gits/gmt/gmt-python/gmt/helpers/decorators.py in new_module(*args, **kwargs)
 197 if alias in kwargs:
 198 kwargs[arg] = kwargs.pop(alias)
--> 199 return module_func(*args, **kwargs)
 200
 201 new_module.aliases = aliases

~/Gits/gmt/gmt-python/gmt/helpers/decorators.py in new_module(*args, **kwargs)
 292 )
 293 # Execute the original function and return its output
--> 294 return module_func(*args, **kwargs)
 295
 296 return new_module

~/Gits/gmt/gmt-python/gmt/base_plotting.py in plot(self, x, y, data, sizes, direction, **kwargs)
 344 with file_context as fname:
 345 arg_str = " ".join([fname, build_arg_string(kwargs)])
--> 346 lib.call_module("plot", arg_str)
 347
 348 @fmt_docstring

~/Gits/gmt/gmt-python/gmt/clib/session.py in call_module(self, module, args)
 488 raise GMTCLibError(
 489 "Module '{}' failed with status code {}:\n{}".format(
--> 490 module, status, self._error_message
 491 )
 492 )

GMTCLibError: Module 'plot' failed with status code 63:
gmt-python-session [ERROR]: Current panel has row or column outsiden range!
psxy [ERROR]: Found no history for option -c

fig.plot() cannot recognize the keyword colors, then pass it directly to gmt plot. Thus the gmt cmd looks like gmt plot ... -colors, which is a wrong syntax for gmt plot.

For unrecognized keyword parameters, maybe we can pass keyword parameters only if the keyword has a single character, and report other unrecognized parameters to users.

System information

• Operating system: macOS
• Python installation (Anaconda, system, ETS): Anaconda
• Version of GMT: 6.0.0 latest
• Version of Python: 3.7.0
• Version of this package: latest
• If using conda, paste the output of conda list below:

[leouieda]

This is a great example of why I'm very unhappy with our current way of handling arguments. If we were using normal Python arguments, this typo would have been easily caught by the Python interpreter. Instead, we would have to implement our own argument checking for every single function because of our decorators for input parsing. I'm playing around with ideas for changing this. Mainly having normal keyword Python arguments and translating things inside the Python function. See #262

[seisman]

I still have the same issue now and then due to typos. I don't think we can work out a better way handling parameters in the next few releases, but at least we can have a workaround:

For unrecognized keyword parameters, maybe we can pass keyword parameters only if the keyword has a single character, and report other unrecognized parameters to users.

I still think this is the easiest workaround. What we should do is add a check at the start of the build_arg_string function, like:

 for key, value in kwargs.items():
 if len(key) > 2: 
 raise GMTInvalidInput(f"Unrecognized parameter {key}.")

here I use len(key) > 2 rather than len(key) > 1, because I know sometimes user use Tm="..." when calling coast.