Skip to content

Bump to Ghostscript 10.06.0 - #4125

Merged
seisman merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
gs/10.06.0
Sep 29, 2025
Merged

Bump to Ghostscript 10.06.0#4125
seisman merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
gs/10.06.0

Conversation

@seisman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Check if GMT 6.5 works well with gs 10.05 and 10.06.

@seisman

seisman commented Sep 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

There are ~10 failures with gs 10.05.1, but these failures are all caused by tiny differences (See the artifacts in https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/pygmt/actions/runs/18094291533?pr=4125). So GMT 6.5 works well with gs 10.05.1!

Edit: Same for gs 10.06.0

@seismanseisman changed the title Bump to Ghostscript 10.05.1Bump to Ghostscript 10.06.0Sep 29, 2025
@seismanseisman mentioned this pull request Sep 29, 2025
43 tasks
@seismanseisman added maintenance Boring but important stuff for the core devs needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. labels Sep 29, 2025
@seismanseisman added this to the 0.17.0 milestone Sep 29, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changed images

This is an auto-generated report of images that have changed on the DVC remote

StatusPath
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_interval.png
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_matrix.png
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_multiple_levels.png
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_one_level.png
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_contour_vec.png
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_text_transparency.png
modifiedpygmt/tests/baseline/test_text_varying_transparency.png

Image diff(s)

Details

Added images

Modified images

PathOldNew
test_contour_interval.png
test_contour_matrix.png
test_contour_multiple_levels.png
test_contour_one_level.png
test_contour_vec.png
test_text_transparency.png
test_text_varying_transparency.png

Report last updated at commit abee012

@yvonnefroehlichyvonnefroehlich left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great 🙂 that there are no transparency-issues with the higher gs versions!

@seismanseisman removed the needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. label Sep 29, 2025
@seisman
seisman merged commit e018a8a into mainSep 29, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@seisman
seisman deleted the gs/10.06.0 branch September 29, 2025 15:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

maintenanceBoring but important stuff for the core devs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@seisman@yvonnefroehlich