Remove annotated frame from the image for the remote dataset "GSHHG Global Earth Mask"

[yvonnefroehlich]

This is related to the comment at GenericMappingTools/pygmt#2728 (comment) by @seisman.

Compared to the images of the other remote datasets, the image of the GSHHG Global Earth Mask remote dataset has a fancy frame and annotations (please see https://www.generic-mapping-tools.org/remote-datasets/). This does not look well and is inconsistent. Thus it is suggested to update this image with a version without the annotated fancy frame.

[PaulWessel]

Agreed, maybe @Esteban82 has time? I’m on my way to an Oslo dinner/show!

[Esteban82]

I have some time.

Should I only delete -Baf -BWsNe in GMT_earthmask.sh?

[Esteban82]

And maybe I could edit the maps of the Crustal Age and geoid and center them at 0 (instead of 180).

[yvonnefroehlich]

I have some time.

Should I only delete -Baf -BWsNe in GMT_earthmask.sh?

Yes, I think so.

[yvonnefroehlich]

And maybe I could edit the maps of the Crustal Age and geoid and center them at 0 (instead of 180).

I think this is a good idea, because I feel it's good to have the images consistent for all remote datasets.

[Esteban82]

Yes, I think so.

Ok. let's try. I also updated the png file.

[yvonnefroehlich]

I am just wondering, whether we should addionaly move the legend for Earth mask inside the image similar to colorbar for Earth Seafloor Crustal Age?

Edit: Just saw you already did this change in the PR 🙂 !

[Esteban82]

I move it a bit upwards but no as much as for the Earth Seafloor Crustal Age. In this map, the legend is over Antarctica.

[Esteban82]

Fixed by #85.

[Esteban82]

And maybe I could edit the maps of the Crustal Age and geoid and center them at 0 (instead of 180).

@PaulWessel is there a script to make all the others statics images (beside AGE and Earthmask)? Should I make it?

[PaulWessel]

Please do, I think those were one liners