Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2022. It is now read-only.
CompressedSourceTest: simplify - #304
Merged
dhalperi merged 1 commit intoJun 14, 2016
Merged
Conversation
We should use random.nextBytes(buff) instead of making the array in a loop. The code we now point to is the same as the for loop, so the test continues to pass.
dhalperi
commented
Jun 14, 2016
ContributorAuthor
R: @tgroh |
tgroh
commented
Jun 14, 2016
Contributor
LGTM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We should use random.nextBytes(buff) instead of making the array in a loop.
The code we now point to is the same as the for loop, so the test continues to pass.
Backport of apache/beam#456