setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

Description

@twentyaibot

Summary

IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

Environment

  • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
  • Java 21
  • Linux x86_64

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
  2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
  3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
  4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
  5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

Expected: <1ms
Actual: ~4,700ms

Minimal Reproduction Code

importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
// THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
}
// Output: ~4700ms per formula
}
staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
introws = 5_000;
intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
// 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
returnwb;
}
staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
returnsb.toString();
}
}

Observed Results

enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
false<1ms
true~4,700ms

The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

Impact

In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

Suspected Cause

When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

      Description

      @twentyaibot

      Summary

      IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

      This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

      Environment

      • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
      • Java 21
      • Linux x86_64

      Steps to Reproduce

      1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
      2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
      3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
      4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
      5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

      Expected: <1ms
      Actual: ~4,700ms

      Minimal Reproduction Code

      importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
      importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
      publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
      publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
      Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
      // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
      wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
      IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
      inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
      System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
      for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
      Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
      longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
      sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
      System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
      }
      // Output: ~4700ms per formula
      }
      staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
      Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
      IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
      introws = 5_000;
      intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
      for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
      for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
      data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
      sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
      // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
      sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
      sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
      sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
      sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
      sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
      sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
      returnwb;
      }
      staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
      StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
      while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
      returnsb.toString();
      }
      }

      Observed Results

      enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
      false<1ms
      true~4,700ms

      The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

      Impact

      In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

      Suspected Cause

      When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

          Description

          @twentyaibot

          Summary

          IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

          This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

          Environment

          • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
          • Java 21
          • Linux x86_64

          Steps to Reproduce

          1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
          2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
          3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
          4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
          5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

          Expected: <1ms
          Actual: ~4,700ms

          Minimal Reproduction Code

          importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
          importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
          publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
          publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
          Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
          // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
          wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
          IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
          inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
          System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
          for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
          Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
          longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
          sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
          System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
          }
          // Output: ~4700ms per formula
          }
          staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
          Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
          IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
          introws = 5_000;
          intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
          for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
          for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
          data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
          sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
          // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
          sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
          sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
          sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
          sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
          sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
          sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
          returnwb;
          }
          staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
          StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
          while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
          returnsb.toString();
          }
          }

          Observed Results

          enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
          false<1ms
          true~4,700ms

          The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

          Impact

          In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

          Suspected Cause

          When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

              Description

              @twentyaibot

              Summary

              IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

              This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

              Environment

              • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
              • Java 21
              • Linux x86_64

              Steps to Reproduce

              1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
              2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
              3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
              4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
              5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

              Expected: <1ms
              Actual: ~4,700ms

              Minimal Reproduction Code

              importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
              importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
              publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
              publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
              Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
              // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
              wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
              IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
              inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
              System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
              for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
              Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
              longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
              sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
              System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
              }
              // Output: ~4700ms per formula
              }
              staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
              Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
              IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
              introws = 5_000;
              intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
              for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
              for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
              data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
              sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
              // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
              sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
              sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
              sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
              sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
              sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
              sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
              returnwb;
              }
              staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
              StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
              while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
              returnsb.toString();
              }
              }

              Observed Results

              enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
              false<1ms
              true~4,700ms

              The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

              Impact

              In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

              Suspected Cause

              When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

                  Description

                  @twentyaibot

                  Summary

                  IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

                  This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

                  Environment

                  • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
                  • Java 21
                  • Linux x86_64

                  Steps to Reproduce

                  1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
                  2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
                  3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
                  4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
                  5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

                  Expected: <1ms
                  Actual: ~4,700ms

                  Minimal Reproduction Code

                  importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
                  importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
                  publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
                  publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
                  Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
                  // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
                  wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
                  IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                  inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
                  System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
                  for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
                  Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
                  longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
                  sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
                  System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
                  }
                  // Output: ~4700ms per formula
                  }
                  staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
                  Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
                  IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                  introws = 5_000;
                  intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
                  for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
                  for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
                  data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
                  sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
                  // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
                  sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
                  sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
                  sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
                  sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
                  sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
                  sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
                  returnwb;
                  }
                  staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
                  StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
                  while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
                  returnsb.toString();
                  }
                  }

                  Observed Results

                  enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
                  false<1ms
                  true~4,700ms

                  The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

                  Impact

                  In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

                  Suspected Cause

                  When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

                      Description

                      @twentyaibot

                      Summary

                      IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

                      This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

                      Environment

                      • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
                      • Java 21
                      • Linux x86_64

                      Steps to Reproduce

                      1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
                      2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
                      3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
                      4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
                      5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

                      Expected: <1ms
                      Actual: ~4,700ms

                      Minimal Reproduction Code

                      importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
                      importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
                      publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
                      publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
                      Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
                      // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
                      wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
                      IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                      inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
                      System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
                      for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
                      Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
                      longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
                      sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
                      System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
                      }
                      // Output: ~4700ms per formula
                      }
                      staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
                      Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
                      IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                      introws = 5_000;
                      intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
                      for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
                      for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
                      data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
                      sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
                      // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
                      sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
                      sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
                      sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
                      sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
                      sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
                      sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
                      returnwb;
                      }
                      staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
                      StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
                      while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
                      returnsb.toString();
                      }
                      }

                      Observed Results

                      enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
                      false<1ms
                      true~4,700ms

                      The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

                      Impact

                      In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

                      Suspected Cause

                      When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

                          Description

                          @twentyaibot

                          Summary

                          IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

                          This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

                          Environment

                          • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
                          • Java 21
                          • Linux x86_64

                          Steps to Reproduce

                          1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
                          2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
                          3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
                          4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
                          5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

                          Expected: <1ms
                          Actual: ~4,700ms

                          Minimal Reproduction Code

                          importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
                          importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
                          publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
                          publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
                          Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
                          // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
                          wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
                          IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                          inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
                          System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
                          for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
                          Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
                          longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
                          sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
                          System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
                          }
                          // Output: ~4700ms per formula
                          }
                          staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
                          Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
                          IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                          introws = 5_000;
                          intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
                          for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
                          for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
                          data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
                          sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
                          // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
                          sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
                          sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
                          sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
                          sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
                          sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
                          sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
                          returnwb;
                          }
                          staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
                          StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
                          while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
                          returnsb.toString();
                          }
                          }

                          Observed Results

                          enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
                          false<1ms
                          true~4,700ms

                          The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

                          Impact

                          In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

                          Suspected Cause

                          When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              setFormula2() 4700x slower with enableIterativeCalculation on large workbooks #9

                              Description

                              @twentyaibot

                              Summary

                              IRange.setFormula2() takes ~4,700ms per cell when enableIterativeCalculation is true and the workbook contains ~560K formula cells created via bulk setFormula2() on rectangular ranges. The same operation takes <1ms with iterative calculation disabled.

                              This makes it impossible to add SUM formulas to a totals row in a large workbook within a reasonable time — 130 SUM formulas × 4.7s = ~10 minutes.

                              Environment

                              • GcExcel Java 9.0.3
                              • Java 21
                              • Linux x86_64

                              Steps to Reproduce

                              1. Create a sheet with 5,000 rows × 17 columns of numeric data
                              2. Use setFormula2() on 7 rectangular ranges (16 cols × 5,000 rows each) to create ~560K formula cells
                              3. Enable iterative calculation: wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true)
                              4. Set wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true)
                              5. Call setFormula2("=SUM(Y4:Y5003)") on a single cell

                              Expected: <1ms
                              Actual: ~4,700ms

                              Minimal Reproduction Code

                              importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.Workbook;
                              importcom.grapecity.documents.excel.IWorksheet;
                              publicclassDsExcelBugRepro {
                              publicstaticvoidmain(String[] args) {
                              Workbookwb = buildWorkbook();
                              // THIS LINE CAUSES THE 4700x SLOWDOWN:wb.getOptions().getFormulas().setEnableIterativeCalculation(true);
                              wb.setDeferUpdateDirtyState(true);
                              IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                              inttotalsRow = 5004; // 1-based, row after 5000 data rowsintlastRow = 5003;
                              System.out.println("With enableIterativeCalculation=true:");
                              for (intci = 24; ci <= 28; ci++) { // columns Y through ACStringcol = indexToCol(ci);
                              Stringformula = "=SUM(" + col + "4:" + col + lastRow + ")";
                              longstart = System.currentTimeMillis();
                              sheet.getRange(col + totalsRow).setFormula2(formula);
                              System.out.println(" " + col + totalsRow + " -> " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - start) + "ms");
                              }
                              // Output: ~4700ms per formula
                              }
                              staticWorkbookbuildWorkbook() {
                              Workbookwb = newWorkbook();
                              IWorksheetsheet = wb.getWorksheets().get(0);
                              introws = 5_000;
                              intds = 3; // data start row (0-based)intlastRow = ds + rows; // 5003Stringr1 = "4"; // first data row (1-based)// 17 columns of numeric dataObject[][] data = newObject[rows][17];
                              for (inti = 0; i < rows; i++)
                              for (intc = 0; c < 17; c++)
                              data[i][c] = 50.0 + (i % 500) + c * 10.0;
                              sheet.getRange(ds, 5, rows, 17).setValue(data);
                              // 560K formula cells via bulk setFormula2 on 16-col × 5000-row rangessheet.getRange("Y4:AN" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + "=0,G" + r1 + ">0),G" + r1 + ",0)");
                              sheet.getRange("AQ4:BF" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + ">F" + r1 + ",Y" + r1 + "=0),G" + r1 + "-F" + r1 + ",0)");
                              sheet.getRange("BI4:BX" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(F" + r1 + ">0,G" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + ",0)");
                              sheet.getRange("CA4:CP" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(G" + r1 + "<F" + r1 + ",BI" + r1 + "=0),F" + r1 + "-G" + r1 + ",0)");
                              sheet.getRange("CR4:DH" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(F" + r1 + ">0,1,0)");
                              sheet.getRange("DK4:DZ" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=0,CS" + r1 + "=1),1,0)");
                              sheet.getRange("EC4:ER" + lastRow).setFormula2("=IF(AND(CR" + r1 + "=1,CS" + r1 + "=0),1,0)");
                              returnwb;
                              }
                              staticStringindexToCol(intc) {
                              StringBuildersb = newStringBuilder();
                              while (c >= 0) { sb.insert(0, (char) ('A' + c % 26)); c = c / 26 - 1; }
                              returnsb.toString();
                              }
                              }

                              Observed Results

                              enableIterativeCalculationTime per SUM formula
                              false<1ms
                              true~4,700ms

                              The slowdown is 4,700x. Cross-sheet references have no effect — tested with and without, same results.

                              Impact

                              In our application, we enable iterative calculation to handle workbooks with circular references. When our AI agent builds a financial model with 5,000 rows and then adds ~130 SUM formulas to a totals row, the total setFormula2 time is ~10 minutes, causing timeouts.

                              Suspected Cause

                              When iterative calculation is enabled, setFormula2() appears to perform an expensive dependency graph traversal (possibly checking for circular references) for each formula added. With 560K existing formula cells, this traversal takes ~4.7 seconds per formula.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions