Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This repository was archived by the owner on May 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @BassamHajar - I liked how you used method chaining here to accomplish the desired results. I would like to add one thing here though. Although it might seem a small thing but giving appropriate names to variables inside methods like
map,filterandreduceis quite important. I see that you have done a mix of both.For example, the
mapmethod usestaskas an internal variable correctly. However,filtermethod usesrateas the variable name whenhourmight have been more appropriate because we are filtering out hours here. Similarly, insidereduce, you have usedaccandcurValwhich might have been coming from the APIs of the reduce method but havingtotal,amountwould have been more appropriate. Don't you think? 🙂Please be mindful of variable naming conventions. Even though they are small things but they happen to make you lot better.