The below example behaves differently between dcptl and numpy:
importnumpy, dpctl, dpctl.tensorasdptdpctl.__version__# Out: '0.15.1dev0+63.g03fd73794'a=numpy.ones((0, 2), dtype='f4')
numpy.min(a, axis=(1,))
# Out: array([], dtype=float32)b=dpt.ones((0, 2), dtype='f4')
dpt.min(b, axis=(1,))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------ValueErrorTraceback (mostrecentcalllast)
CellIn[15], line1---->1dpt.min(b, axis=(1,))
File~/miniconda3/envs/dpnp_dev/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dpctl/tensor/_reduction.py:499, inmin(x, axis, keepdims)
474defmin(x, axis=None, keepdims=False):
475"""min(x, axis=None, dtype=None, keepdims=False) 476 477 Calculates the minimum value of the input array `x`. (...) 497 array has the same data type as `x`. 498 """-->499return_comparison_over_axis(x, axis, keepdims, ti._min_over_axis)
File~/miniconda3/envs/dpnp_dev/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dpctl/tensor/_reduction.py:421, in_comparison_over_axis(x, axis, keepdims, _reduction_fn)
419res_usm_type=x.usm_type420ifx.size==0:
-->421raiseValueError("reduction does not support zero-size arrays")
422ifred_nd==0:
423returnxValueError: reductiondoesnotsupportzero-sizearraysAs I can see python Array API notes the use case as implementation-defined. Should dpctl align the behavior with numpy here?
The below example behaves differently between dcptl and numpy:
As I can see python Array API notes the use case as
implementation-defined. Should dpctl align the behavior with numpy here?