Skip to content

docs: correct P-384 build-failure state — v0.6.0 breaks the wrapper staging step - #65

Merged
JC-000 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/p384-build-state-correction
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

docs: correct P-384 build-failure state — v0.6.0 breaks the wrapper staging step#65
JC-000 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/p384-build-state-correction

Conversation

@JC-000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Recovers the second commit intended for #64 (it was pushed after #64 had already been merged, so it never landed). Content unchanged from the commit described in #64's PR body.

CLAUDE.md's three P-384 references still described the v0.3.0-era failure (unresolved ec_base384_x/y at link). Verified 2026-07-26 at the v0.6.0 pin: both make p384-overlay and make BACKEND=uci USE_OVERLAY_P384_EMBED=1 now fail earlier, at the ar65 staging step in tools/integration/build_nistcurves_p384.sh (nistcurves_p384_staging/curve/ecdsa384.o never produced — upstream layout drift under the v0.5.0/v0.6.0 bumps). The SHA-384 LUT overlay overflow and the ec_base384_x/y bug likely still lurk behind it.

Test plan

  • Both P-384 build targets exercised at HEAD 2026-07-26 to confirm the documented failure mode
  • Cherry-picked cleanly onto current master (1c0ebaf)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…taging step
The three P-384 references in CLAUDE.md still described the v0.3.0-era
failure (unresolved ec_base384_x/y at link). Verified 2026-07-26 at the
v0.6.0 pin: both make p384-overlay and USE_OVERLAY_P384_EMBED=1 now fail
earlier, in build_nistcurves_p384.sh at the ar65 staging step
(ecdsa384.o never produced — upstream layout drift). The SHA-384 LUT
overlay overflow and the ec_base384_x/y bug likely still lurk behind it.
Also records the closure of stale issues #32/#45 and marks the P-384
wall-clock as unmeasurable until the build is fixed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@JC-000
JC-000 merged commit cb6eab4 into masterJul 27, 2026
@JC-000
JC-000 deleted the docs/p384-build-state-correction branch July 27, 2026 16:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@JC-000