add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

add test for query with strict keyword - #328

Closed
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master
Closed

add test for query with strict keyword#328
testercwt wants to merge 2 commits into
JuliaDatabases:masterfrom
testercwt:master

Conversation

@testercwt

Copy link
Copy Markdown

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params, therefore strict will be always false in SQLite 1.6.0

kwargs in DBInterface will transform to params
@metab0t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Keywords in definition of DBInterface.execute in SQLite is shadowed by keyword argument version in DBInterface and they are packed with SQL parameters as a whole.

https://github.com/JuliaDatabases/DBInterface.jl/blob/85891482dfc5cd2c6c7c40adaf96ad813c9f0a6d/src/DBInterface.jl#L151

So I think we should remove allowduplicates::Bool = false, strict::Bool = false in function definition as well, but it feels a little strange because we extract two special names from SQL parameters.
What is your opinion @quinnj?

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (3e576b9) to head (77a6f4a).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #328 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.60% 93.63% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 4 4 Lines 563 566 +3 ==========================================
+ Hits 527 530 +3 
Misses 36 36 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, I don't love having to extra the keyword args from the params; let me try to think of an alternative solution here.

@evetionevetion mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
@quinnj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing as superseded by #346, which provides a cleaner solution to the strict keyword functionality. Thanks for the contribution @testercwt!

@quinnjquinnj closed this Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@testercwt@metab0t@quinnj