Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix frule for static array constructor that converts eltype - #275
Merged
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| @test ẏ == @SVector [0.0, 0.0, 0.0] | ||
| end | ||
| @testset "convertable type" begin |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How is this case different than the first?
MemberAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The first element of x is an Int rather than an Float64
oxinabox
commented
Mar 5, 2024
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
oxinabox
commented
Mar 6, 2024
MemberAuthor
cool and I see you have pushed this to the for_cedar branch also |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously for the convertable case this errored with
This does make use of the general assumption of ChainRulesCore that Number's are their own tangent type.
But I think that is fine, that assumption exists in a whole bunch of places and if you violate it you should expect suffering.