Version 0.8.3 - #198
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
kimikage
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 14, 2020 14:00
Collaborator
Author
|
If nothing else needs to be fixed, I will release v0.8.3 and start introducing breaking changes as v0.9 material. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is for displaying the progress. (cf. Issue #185)
big()andrationalize()forFixedPoint#186clamp#194bitstringforFixedPointnumbers #195I've confirmed that the invalidation problem in
Basedoesn't get too bad, but I haven't benchmarked with packages likePlots. (I'm not sure what the reasonable conditions are, as JuliaLang/julia has some PRs for invalidation problem, which haven't been merged yet.)