Skip to content
View KIM3310's full-sized avatar

Highlights

  • Pro

Block or report KIM3310

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
KIM3310/README.md

Doeon Kim

Operational AI and infrastructure engineer building reviewable agent, data, manufacturing, and secure-workflow systems.

Live systems gallery · LinkedIn · Private collaboration route

I build systems whose control flow, failure modes, data boundaries, and verification path can be inspected. Public demos use synthetic or fixture data unless a repository explicitly states otherwise; planning documents do not establish customer deployment or revenue.

System Overview

CapabilityRepresentative evidence
Operational AIfab-ops-yield-control-tower, AegisOps
Agent and runtime reliabilitystage-pilot, agent-runtime-go
Governed data and enterprise AIlakehouse-contract-lab, enterprise-llm-adoption-kit
Systems performancememoryflow-lab — KV-cache placement, capacity gates, data movement, and held-out GPU validation
Private and controlled workflowsllm-onprem-deployment-kit, secure-xl2hwp-local

Review the curated architecture index, repository evidence map, and quality gate before treating a demo or planning document as production evidence.

Three-Minute Proof

  1. fab-ops-yield-control-tower: inspect staged fab/scanner operations, release gates, and the documented MES/SCADA boundary.
  2. AegisOps: run the deterministic replay suite and inspect schema, rubric, incident-report, and operator-handoff behavior.
  3. enterprise-llm-adoption-kit: review RBAC, redaction, injection checks, evaluation gates, and environment-gated providers.
  4. stage-pilot: reproduce the 60-case, 30-mode parser-recovery benchmark and inspect the 33.3% / 66.7% / 90.0% strategy results.
  5. lakehouse-contract-lab: run the contract, quality, deterministic-artifact, and API verification path.

For a visual first pass, open the live systems gallery and then use each repository's own verification command.

Evaluation Path

  1. Open the live gallery and choose one operational system, one runtime, and one data system.
  2. Read that repository's System Overview, operating boundary, architecture notes, and quality gate.
  3. Run the documented local verification command before relying on benchmark or readiness claims.
  4. Use the account-level cloud and AI architecture blueprint, machine-readable manifest, and architecture validator for cross-system context.
Business and readiness details

These documents describe readiness and routing. They do not prove provider approval, payout activation, customer use, or guaranteed income.

Start Here

For a lane-oriented technical review, use this order:

  1. fab-ops-yield-control-tower
  2. AegisOps
  3. enterprise-llm-adoption-kit
  4. stage-pilot
  5. lakehouse-contract-lab
  6. aix-pilot

The current public inventory contains 30 active public original repositories and 15 archived public original repositories. The dated 35-repository publication and commercial catalog remains a historical snapshot; memoryflow-lab is represented in this active public inventory as systems-performance research evidence rather than a speculative service SKU.

Engineering Boundaries

  • AI assistance is used for implementation drafts, tests, documentation, and review; ownership is demonstrated through requirements, debugging, verification, and explainable decisions.
  • Synthetic results are not presented as customer deployments or universal product performance.
  • Hardware measurements retain environment and protocol metadata and state where they do not generalize.
  • Private case studies expose sanitized public demos rather than inaccessible source or architecture links.
  • Repositories fail explicitly when required inputs, credentials, or operating assumptions are absent.

Background

  • Computer Science coursework, Korea National Open University, 2026–present.
  • Computer Science degree candidate through the Bachelor's Degree Examination for Self-Education, expected November 2027.
  • Microsoft AI School, 8th cohort.
  • AI Semiconductor Architecture Design and Performance Optimization, Seoul ICT Innovation Square / KAIT, completed July 2026.
  • IT infrastructure operations: monitoring, access administration, backup, incident response, workspace administration, vendor coordination, and shift handoff.
  • Six-person microwave (MW) communications squad leadership, ROK Defense Communication Command.
  • Microsoft Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-900).

Contact

For professional collaboration or a scoped technical discussion:

Pinned Loading

  1. AegisOpsAegisOpsPublic

    Multimodal incident analysis system with structured postmortems, replay evals, and operator handoff.

    TypeScript

  2. doeon-kim-portfoliodoeon-kim-portfolioPublic

    Systems gallery for data-center security operations, military MW communications, IT infrastructure, AI runtimes, data contracts, and applied ML.

    HTML

  3. enterprise-llm-adoption-kitenterprise-llm-adoption-kitPublic

    LLM governance toolkit with RBAC, evals, audit logging, routing boundaries, and optional data-platform adapters.

    Python

  4. stage-pilotstage-pilotPublic

    Tool-calling reliability lab with deterministic mutation tests, retry orchestration, and an attributed Apache-2.0 parser baseline.

    TypeScript

  5. districtpilot-aidistrictpilot-aiPublic

    Native analytics app for post-move demand forecasting, district-level action cards, and operations monitoring.

    Python

  6. Nexus-HiveNexus-HivePublic

    Governed NL-to-SQL analytics workbench with policy checks, audit trails, warehouse adapters, and chart output.

    Python 1