Added hooking detection in auth.cpp for the req ( Request ) function

[seeby2]

The "is_hooked" function is placed at the top of the file "Security.hpp"

This fixes the vulnerability to hook "curl_easy_setopt" wich allowed attackers to send back fake data/spoof the response.
This also makes it so the Keyauth Patcher/Dumper Doenst work anymore.

[github-actions]

The KeyAuth owner has been notified of your pull request. Please wait for him to review it. This could take several days.

[chvrs1122]

Nice paste this very bad and doesn't help with Security at all or atleast temporarily you should safe bytes of the function and cmp them a smart reverser would do as following

mov r9, (0xmy_hook_address ^ 0xffffff)
xor r9, 0xffffff
push r9
ret

Which Bypasses your "Protection"

[seeby2]

Nice paste this very bad and doesn't help with Security at all or atleast temporarily you should safe bytes of the function and cmp them a smart reverser would do as following

mov r9, (0xmy_hook_address ^ 0xffffff)
xor r9, 0xffffff
push r9
ret

Which Bypasses your "Protection"

its not a paste, ive just started learning about protection and have been trying to improve but having a hard time.
got any improvement tips?

[chvrs1122]

Nice paste this very bad and doesn't help with Security at all or atleast temporarily you should safe bytes of the function and cmp them a smart reverser would do as following

mov r9, (0xmy_hook_address ^ 0xffffff)
xor r9, 0xffffff
push r9
ret

Which Bypasses your "Protection"

its not a paste, ive just started learning about protection and have been trying to improve but having a hard time. got any improvement tips?

i deadass saw this in some free protection but instead of checking just compare bytes take a snapshot and compare them

[seeby2]

Nice paste this very bad and doesn't help with Security at all or atleast temporarily you should safe bytes of the function and cmp them a smart reverser would do as following

mov r9, (0xmy_hook_address ^ 0xffffff)
xor r9, 0xffffff
push r9
ret

Which Bypasses your "Protection"

its not a paste, ive just started learning about protection and have been trying to improve but having a hard time. got any improvement tips?

i deadass saw this in some free protection but instead of checking just compare bytes take a snapshot and compare them

well thats possible, but i dont paste at all. i have actual learning intentions.
i will look into your tip. thankyou