Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Group classification type - #2030
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.
Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.
| TEXT = "text" | ||
| CHECKLIST = "checklist" | ||
| RADIO = "radio" | ||
| GROUP = "group" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
GROUP classification type may need options requirement
Medium Severity
The new GROUP classification type is not added to _REQUIRES_OPTIONS, allowing creation of GROUP classifications without any options. Semantically, a "group" implies grouping items together, which would require options to be meaningful. An empty GROUP classification (with nothing to group) may result in invalid ontologies or unexpected behavior during labeling. If GROUP is intended to behave like CHECKLIST/RADIO, it needs to be added to _REQUIRES_OPTIONS.
Additional Locations (1)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Description
Added a new "group" type for classifications.
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
All Submissions
New Feature Submissions
Changes to Core Features
Note
Introduces support for group classifications.
GROUPtoClassification.Typeinclassification.py_REQUIRES_OPTIONSremains checklist/radio)Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit a43a728. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.