Skip to content

VOCS APOSMM direct implementation - #1711

Open
shuds13 wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
aposmm_vocs_no_process
Open

VOCS APOSMM direct implementation#1711
shuds13 wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
aposmm_vocs_no_process

Conversation

@shuds13

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@jlnav

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It was always a matter of time :)

@codecov

codecovBot commented Apr 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.55556% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.35%. Comparing base (3d20f6f) to head (7477cfc).
⚠️ Report is 21 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
libensemble/gen_classes/aposmm.py85.55%12 Missing and 14 partials ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (3d20f6f) and HEAD (7477cfc). Click for more details.

HEAD has 12 uploads less than BASE
FlagBASE (3d20f6f)HEAD (7477cfc)
2210
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## develop #1711 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 92.84% 77.35% -15.50% 
============================================
Files 81 81 Lines 8218 8324 +106 Branches 1259 1291 +32 ============================================
- Hits 7630 6439 -1191 - Misses 387 1646 +1259 - Partials 201 239 +38 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@shuds13

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We should have the ability to not have to pass *on_cube around.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shuds13@jlnav