Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

Description

@KANIXB

Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

  1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
    Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
    We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
  2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
    Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
    Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

      Description

      @KANIXB

      Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
      mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

      1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
        Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
        We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
      2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
        Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
        Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

      We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

          Description

          @KANIXB

          Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
          mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

          1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
            Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
            We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
          2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
            Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
            Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

          We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

              Description

              @KANIXB

              Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
              mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

              1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
                Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
                We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
              2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
                Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
                Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

              We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

                  Description

                  @KANIXB

                  Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
                  mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

                  1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
                    Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
                    We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
                  2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
                    Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
                    Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

                  We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

                      Description

                      @KANIXB

                      Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
                      mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

                      1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
                        Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
                        We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
                      2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
                        Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
                        Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

                      We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

                          Description

                          @KANIXB

                          Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
                          mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

                          1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
                            Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
                            We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
                          2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
                            Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
                            Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

                          We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Some key management issue when sign and verify JWT signature. #19

                              Description

                              @KANIXB

                              Hi, we are a research group to help developers build secure applications. We designed a cryptographic misuse detector on Java language(Our main concern is the secure implementation and use of Json Web Token). We found your great public repository (i.e.,
                              mmall-java) from Github, and a security issue detected by our detector are shown in the following. The specific security issues we found are as follows:

                              1. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.infrasucture.security; Class: RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken.class
                                Security issue: not verify the public key certificate used to validate JWT signature.
                                We detected that the RSA256PublicJWTAccessToken method get public key from the certificate without any verification. An attacker may use the private key corresponding to a revoked or expired or self-signed public key certificate to forge a JWT. We recommend to verify the validity of certificates and certificate chains to improve system security.
                              2. Location: Package: com.github.key.mmall.security.provider; Class: RSA256JWTAccessToken.class
                                Security issue: using hard-coded KeyStore password.
                                Hard-coded password are not security, and the attacker can attack the system by privilege escalation attacks. The security analysis can be seen in the artical : Cryptoguard: High precision detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities in massive-sized java projects. It is more secure to pass the password when running the project.

                              We wish the above security issues cloud truly help you to build a secure application. If you have any concern or suggestion, please feel free to contact us, we are looking forwart to your reply. Thanks.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions