Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add scheduled sync and build, template for customization of Loop - #48
Add scheduled sync and build, template for customization of Loop#48marionbarker wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Note from April 6, 2023 - posted on zulipchat also. I am testing this with a special test branch: wip/dev-sync-customize, where I changed targets to point to dev for upstream (instead of main) and to that special test branch (instead of main) in my repo with my own customizations. It failed because I had changed my testing branch to use a version of Loop not consistent with dev. Message was: I manually updated the branch to match the expected Loop commit for my special test branch. It should work without errors next time. |
marionbarker
commented
Apr 11, 2023
Note on 11-April-2023 The Auto-update Action (on my special test branch: wip/dev-sync-customize) ran successfully on Mon, 10 Apr 2023 07:00:40 GMT as scheduled. (update.yml) This branch is similar to the PR with these differences
It correctly reported there were no updates to be pulled from dev. |
bjornoleh
commented
Apr 12, 2023
Automatic sync by GitHub actions will fail in least two situations:
Alternatively, try the manual “Sync fork” in GitHub. If there is a merge conflict, you will be offered the alternative to discard your changes by resetting the branch to the state of the upstream branch.
GitHub Actions cannot update it’s own workflow file. I am not sure if this is due to a technical limitation, or as a safety feature. In this case, a manual “Sync fork” will work, without the need to discard changes. The next time the sync action will run successfully, provided there are no changes to the workflow(s). |
marionbarker
commented
Apr 21, 2023
On April 20, 2023, I created a LoopWorkspace/patches folder and added two patches to the folder (in my special test branch: wip/dev-sync-customize). That worked as expected - the patches were added when I tested the build from TestFlight. On April 21, 2023, I needed to manually update that branch because there were non-trivial update and GitHub required me to discard my modifications before it would update. (Therefore, those changes will not show up online at my GitHub username.) |
marionbarker
commented
May 1, 2023
Closing this PR since it is based on work from @bjornoleh.(PR #43). |
Took @bjornoleh idea from PR #43 and modified it slightly.
Add changes from PR #47 to dev branch (already added to main).