MLTor

Project Overview

This repository contains data, feature extraction code, and evaluation scripts for Website Fingerprinting (WF) under both Closed-World and Open-World scenarios.

The primary goals of this project are:

To provide a structured dataset of monitored and unmonitored traffic traces.
To extract handcrafted traffic features (Full / Robust / Basic).
To evaluate the robustness of traffic classification under various WF defense settings (split, padding, domain shift).

Dataset

Download Link:Google Drive - MLTor Dataset

We provide serialized datasets for both closed-world and open-world experiments. Each dataset contains monitored (known sites) and unmonitored (unknown sites) traffic traces.

File Structure

Please download the files from the link above and organize them into a dataset directory as follows:

dataset/openworld/mon_standard.pkl
dataset/closeworld/unmon_standard10.pkl
dataset/closeworld/unmon_standard10_3000.pkl

After downloading and organizing the datasets, you must update the file paths in the notebooks to match your local environment.

In each notebook (Closed.ipynb, Open_binary.ipynb, Open_multi.ipynb), locate the CONFIGURATION section at the top and modify the PATHS dictionary:

PATHS= {
# Update these paths to match your local file location"mon": "./your/local/path/dataset/openworld/mon_standard.pkl",
"unmon": "./your/local/path/dataset/closeworld/unmon_standard10_3000.pkl"
}

Ensure that the paths correctly point to where you saved the .pkl files on your machine.

File Descriptions

All datasets are serialized using the Python pickle format.

File	Description
`mon_standard.pkl`	Monitored traffic from 95 websites (≈19k traces)
`unmon_standard10.pkl`	Unmonitored traffic (≈10k traces)
`unmon_standard10_3000.pkl`	Reduced unmonitored subset (≈3k traces)

Experiment 1: Closed-World

Goal: Classify traffic traces into one of 95 monitored websites (Classes 0-94).

Key Metrics: Accuracy, Macro-F1.

1. How to Run

You can reproduce the experimental results by running the main Jupyter Notebook.

Closed.ipynb

Configuration: Locate the Configuration section at the beginning of the notebook and ensure the SCENARIO variable is set as follows:

SCENARIO='closed'

Simply run the entire notebook after setting this variable.

2. Execution Pipeline

Data Loading: Automatically loads monitored traffic data. (Note Unmonitored data is skipped to optimize memory).
Model Optimization (RF vs XGB):
- Compares Random Forest and XGBoost under various correlation thresholds (e.g., 0.95, 0.99).
- Automatically selects the best model based on Accuracy.
Feature Selection: Applies EnhancedPreProcessor to remove highly correlated features using the optimal threshold.
Final Evaluation: Outputs the Best Model, Optimal Threshold, Accuracy, and Macro-F1 score.

3. Expected Output

The console will display the model selection process and final results:

================================================================================
CLOSED-WORLD MODEL SELECTION (Primary Metric: Accuracy)
================================================================================
SELECTED MODEL: Random Forest
• Corr Threshold: 0.95
• Accuracy: 0.8412
• Macro F1: 0.8350
================================================================================

Experiment 2: Open-World (Binary)

Goal: Determine whether a given web traffic trace corresponds to a Monitored website (Known) or an Unmonitored website (Unknown). This is achieved by training a model on 95 Monitored classes and using Open-Set Rejection (Confidence Scoring) to reject Unknown samples.

Label Assignment:

Monitored Websites: 1 (Internally 0-94 for multi-class training)
Unmonitored Websites: -1

Key Metrics:

ROC-AUC: Primary criterion for model selection (Measures overall discriminative power).
TPR (Recall): Measures the rate of correctly identifying Known/Monitored traffic.
FPR: Measures the rate of incorrectly classifying Unknown/Unmonitored traffic as Known (Lower is better).
Precision: Measures the rate of correctly rejecting Unknown/Unmonitored traffic (TNR = 1 - FPR).

1. How to Run

You can reproduce the experimental results by running the main Jupyter Notebook.

Open_binary.ipynb

Configuration: Locate the Configuration section at the beginning of the notebook and ensure the SCENARIO variable is set as follows:

SCENARIO='open_binary'

2. Execution Pipeline

Data Loading: Automatically loads monitored traffic data and unmonitored traffic data.
Binary Label Construction:
- Monitored traffic → 1
- Unmonitored traffic (value defined in CURRENT_CONFIG['unmon_label']) → -1
Train/Test Split:
- The full dataset (X, y_binary) is split into training (X_train, y_train) and testing (X_test, y_test) sets using stratified sampling stratify=y_binary to preserve class balance.
- test_size and random_state from CURRENT_CONFIG
Nested Evaluation Loop: A results list (results_binary) is created and filled with results for every combination of:
- Correlation Thresholds — from CURRENT_CONFIG['corr_th']
- Confidence Threshold Percentiles — from CURRENT_CONFIG['threshold_percentiles']
- Models — Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB)
- This produces a full grid of experiments.
Preprocessing (per Correlation Threshold): For each corr_th value:
- EnhancedPreprocessor(correlation_threshold=corr_th) is created.
- X_train → fit_transform
- X_test → transform
- This removes highly correlated features according to the specified threshold.
Model Training (Once per Correlation Threshold):
- For each correlation threshold, the notebook trains:
  - Random Forest (RF)
    - Trained on X_train_prep with binary labels y_train
  - XGBoost (XGB)
    - Uses CustomLabelEncoder to convert the binary labels {-1, 1} into encoded form {0, 1} for XGBoost's binary:logistic objective.
    - Trained on preprocessed features and encoded labels.
    - Note: Each model is trained only once per correlation threshold; threshold tuning happens afterward.
Confidence-Based Threshold Tuning & Rejection:
- For each threshold percentile (th_pct):
  - Step A — Compute Confidence
    - RF: rf_proba = rf_model.predict_proba(X_test_prep)
    - XGB: xgb_proba = xgb_model.predict_proba(X_test_prep)
    - Confidence for each sample:
      conf=np.max(proba, axis=1)
  - Step B — Compute Decision Threshold
```
threshold=np.percentile(conf, th_pct)
```
  - Step C — Apply Rejection Rule
    - If confidence < threshold, reassign prediction to -1 (unmonitored).
- This implements an open-world rejection mechanism: If the model is not confident enough, classify as unmonitored.
Final Model Selection:
- The final model is automatically selected based on the highest ROC-AUC score achieved across all configurations.
- Outputs the Best Model, Optimal Correlation Threshold, Optimal Threshold Percentile, ROC-AUC, TPR, FPR, and Precision.

3. Expected Output

The console will display the model selection process and final results:

================================================================================
OPEN-WORLD BINARY MODEL SELECTION (Primary: ROC-AUC)
================================================================================
• Model : XGB
• Corr Threshold : 1.0000
• Threshold Percentile : 3.0000
• Roc Auc : 0.9676
• Tpr : 0.9863
• Fpr : 0.2733
• Precision : 0.9581
================================================================================

Experiment 3: Open-World (Multi-Class)

Goal:

Determine whether an incoming traffic trace belongs to a Monitored website (Known, classes 0–94) or an Unmonitored website (Unknown, -1).
If the trace is accepted as Monitored, classify it into one of the 95 monitored website classes.

Key Metrics:

Binary Detection Metrics
- ROC-AUC — Primary model-selection metric
- Precision — Secondary selection metric
- TPR — True Positive Rate
- FPR — False Positive Rate
- TNR — True Negative Rate
95-Class Identification Metrics
- Computed only for samples that are accepted:
- Monitored Accuracy
- Monitored Macro-F1
Evaluated on all test samples
- Overall Accuracy

1. How to Run

Run the notebook: Open_multi.ipynb

Configuration: Locate the Configuration section at the beginning of the notebook and ensure the SCENARIO variable is set as follows:

SCENARIO='open_multi'

2. Execution Pipeline

Data Loading
- The notebook loads:
  - Monitored dataset (95 classes)
  - Unmonitored dataset (label = -1)
  - Important:
    - Training uses only Monitored samples
    - Unmonitored samples are used only for testing

Train/Test Split

# Monitored split (train + test)X_mon_train, X_mon_test, y_mon_train, y_mon_test=train_test_split(..., stratify=y_mon)
# Unmonitored split (test only)X_unmon_train, X_unmon_test, ... =train_test_split(...)

Note: Only X_unmon_test is used for evaluation. The unmonitored train split is not used because the model is trained exclusively on monitored samples.

Nested Evaluation Loop
- For each:
  - Correlation Threshold ∈ [1.0, 0.99, 0.98, 0.95, 0.9]
  - Threshold Percentile ∈ [10, 15, 20, 25, 30]
  - Model ∈ {RF, XGB}
the notebook runs:
- Preprocessing
- Model training (monitored only)
- Open-set rejection
- Evaluation
All results go into:
```
results_open
```
Preprocessing — Per Correlation Threshold
```
prep=EnhancedPreprocessor(correlation_threshold=corr_th)
X_mon_train_prep=prep.fit_transform(X_mon_train)
X_mon_test_prep=prep.transform(X_mon_test)
X_unmon_test_prep=prep.transform(X_unmon_test)
```
The preprocessor performs:
- Correlation-based feature pruning
- StandardScaler normalization
- Fit using only Monitored training data
- Stores feature_names, ensuring proper column ordering at transform time

Model Training

Two models are trained once per correlation threshold.

Random Forest

rf_model=RandomForestClassifier(**CURRENT_CONFIG['rf'])
rf_model.fit(X_mon_train_prep, y_mon_train)

XGBoost

le=CustomLabelEncoder()
y_mon_train_enc=le.fit_transform(y_mon_train)
xgb_model=XGBClassifier(
objective='multi:softprob',
num_class=len(le.mapper),
**CURRENT_CONFIG['xgb']
)
xgb_model.fit(X_mon_train_prep, y_mon_train_enc)

Models are never trained on unmonitored data.

Open-Set Rejection (Confidence Thresholding)

Note: This implementation computes the threshold using the monitored test split, not a separate validation set. The code does not create or use a dedicated validation set.

For each percentile (threshold_pct):

A. Compute a threshold from monitored validation-set confidences

y_mon_conf=np.max(y_mon_proba, axis=1)
threshold=np.percentile(y_mon_conf, threshold_pct)

B. Apply rejection separately Monitored:

y_mon_pred=np.where(
y_mon_conf>=threshold,
y_mon_pred_classes, -1
)

Unmonitored:

y_unmon_conf=np.max(y_unmon_proba, axis=1)
y_unmon_pred=np.where(
y_unmon_conf>=threshold,
y_unmon_pred_classes, # argmax 기반 predicted classes-1
)

C. Combine

y_pred_all=np.concatenate([y_mon_pred, y_unmon_pred])
y_true_all=np.concatenate([y_mon_test, y_unmon_test])

This implements Max-Softmax Open-Set Recognition (OSR).

Evaluation
- Metrics are computed directly inside the open-multi evaluation loop and stored in results_open.
- Includes:
  - Binary Detection TPR, FPR, TNR, Precision, ROC-AUC
  - Overall Metrics Overall Accuracy
  - Monitored 95-Class Metrics Monitored Accuracy, Monitored Macro-F1
- Each result is appended to:
```
results_open
```
- Threshold Stability: Among configurations with similar ROC-AUC and Precision, mid-range percentiles (e.g., 15–30%) are preferred to avoid unstable extremes.
Final Model Selection
- The best model is selected using:
  - ROC-AUC (Primary)
  - Precision (Secondary)
  - Threshold Stability (Tertiary)
- Final best row is selected accordingly using:
```
FINAL_MODEL_INFO=select_final_model_strict(
'open_multi',
df_open,
)
```
95-Class Direct Classifier (Baseline)
- The updated implementation evaluates a monitored-only 95-class classifier:
- Trained on: Monitored training only
- Tested on: Monitored test + Unmonitored test
- Performs NO open-set rejection
- This shows how poorly a closed-world classifier performs when unmonitored samples appear.

3. Expected Output

The console will display the model selection process and final results:

================================================================================
OPEN-WORLD MULTI-CLASS MODEL SELECTION
Primary: ROC-AUC | Secondary: Precision | Tertiary: Threshold Stability
================================================================================
SELECTED MODEL: RF
• Corr Threshold: 0.99
• Threshold Percentile: 30.0%
• ROC-AUC: 0.8403
• Precision: 0.9712
• TPR: 0.7000
• FPR: 0.1317
• Overall Acc: 0.7050
================================================================================

Module: Break WF Defense (Defense Evaluation)

This module evaluates robustness against traffic analysis defenses.

Dataset (Defense)

Download Link:Google Drive - Defense Dataset

The dataset is stored in .cell format within compressed archives. Note: Please extract the .zip files within your code execution environment.

Type	File Name	Classes	Total Instances	Note
Monitored	`mon_50.zip`	50 (0–49)	10,000	Balanced (200/class)
Unmonitored	`unmon_5000.zip`	1 (-1)	5,000	Single class

Instance Structure

Each instance contains multiple variations (defense simulations):

Keys: ['split_0', 'split_1', 'split_2', 'split_3', 'split_4', 'join']
Shape: $(N, 3)$ where $N$ is packet count.
Features: [Time, Direction, Signed Size]

Evaluation Scenarios

Scenario	Description
Closed-World	Standard 50-class classification
Open-Binary	Detect whether a trace is from a monitored site
Open-Multi	Detect + classify monitored sites among unknown ones

Defense Simulation Scenarios

Traffic defenses are simulated through split-domain datasets and robust feature reduction:

join → split: models trained on normal traffic, tested on defended (domain-shifted) traces.
split → split: models trained and tested on defended traffic.

How to Run

You can reproduce the experimental results by running the main Jupyter Notebook.

break_WF_defense.ipynb

This notebook covers feature extraction, preprocessing, and evaluation for all three scenarios (Closed, Open-Binary, Open-Multi). You can run these steps sequentially in the provided notebook/script.

Prerequisites: Ensure the dataset files (mon_50.zip, unmon_5000.zip) are located in the data directory as defined in the notebook.

Common: Feature Extraction & Preprocessing

Before running any specific experiments, load the raw data and extract features.

Experiment 1 : Closed-World

Evaluate performance on 50 monitored sites using Multi-class Classification.

Step 1: Create Train/Test Splits

Generate stratified train/test sets for both 'Join' (undefended) and 'Split' (defended) datasets.

# Returns dictionaries containing X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test for each splitfull_split_datasets, summary=create_split_trained_datasets(mon_data_full)

Step 2: Run Evaluation Scenarios

Run both Join-Trained (Baseline) and Split-Trained (Robustness) scenarios.

# Returns results for Scenario 1 (df_s1) and Scenario 2 (df_s2)df_s1, df_s2=run_all_scenarios(mon_data_full, full_split_datasets, models_to_closed)

Step 3: Visualization

Compare performance across feature sets (Full vs. Robust vs. Basic).

# Generate Bar plots and Line charts for Macro-F1 & Accuracyplot_feature_set_comparison(df_s1_full, df_s2_full, ...)
plot_macro_f1_lines(df_join_all, df_split_all)

Experiment 2 : Open-World (Binary)

Evaluate the ability to distinguish Monitored vs. Unmonitored traffic.

Step 1: Run Scenarios (Auto-Threshold)

Train the model and automatically find the optimal confidence threshold for detection.

# Find optimal threshold (ROC-AUC, TPR, FPR, etc.)df_auto_full=run_auto_threshold_binary_all(mon_data_full, unmon_data_full, models_to_open_binary)
# Run evaluation with fixed thresholdsdf_fixed_full=run_fixed_threshold_binary_all(mon_data_full, unmon_data_full, models_to_open_binary, th_full)

Step 2: Visualization

Visualize detection performance and trade-offs.

# Plot F1-Score, ROC-AUC, and TPR vs. FPR curvesplot_open_binary_all(df_fixed_full, df_fixed_robust, df_fixed_basic)

Experiment 3 : Open-World (Multi-class)

Evaluate model performance on open-set multi-class classification, which jointly measures detection (monitored vs unmonitored) and class-level identification.

Step 1: Run Scenarios (Auto-Threshold) Two primary setups are evaluated:

Join → Split: Train on undefended (Join) traffic, test on defended (Split) traffic → tests domain-shift robustness.
Split → Split: Train and test on defended traffic → tests in-defense adaptability.

# Run Open-Multi evaluation for all feature setsdf_multi_full=run_open_multi_pipeline(mon_data_full, unmon_data_full, models_to_open_multi)
df_multi_robust=run_open_multi_pipeline(mon_data_robust, unmon_data_robust, models_to_open_multi)
df_multi_basic=run_open_multi_pipeline(mon_data_basic, unmon_data_basic, models_to_open_multi)

Step 2: Visualization

Compare detection and classification metrics across thresholds and feature sets.

# Plot Detection-F1 and Class-F1 by Threshold
plot_open_multi_f1(df_multi_full, df_multi_robust, df_multi_basic)
# Plot ROC-AUC trends by Feature Set
plot_open_multi_auc(df_multi_full, df_multi_robust, df_multi_basic)

Reference Papers

Deep Fingerprinting (Sirinam et al., CCS 2018) — Baseline deep model.
Subverting Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Robust Traffic Representation (Shen et al., 2023) — Inspiration for TAM representations.

Questions & Contact

Please address any questions to the authors/developers:

Eunhyeon Kwon (keh54110@gmail.com)
Hyewon Kim (hhongyeahh@gmail.com)
Yoonhyung Park (pyoon820@gmail.com)
Jeongin Heo (jeongin0822@gmail.com)
Seoyeon Ahn (aliceasy504@gmail.com)

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

Repository files navigation

MLTor

Project Overview

Dataset

File Structure

File Descriptions

Experiment 1: Closed-World

1. How to Run

2. Execution Pipeline

3. Expected Output

Experiment 2: Open-World (Binary)

1. How to Run

2. Execution Pipeline

3. Expected Output

Experiment 3: Open-World (Multi-Class)

1. How to Run

2. Execution Pipeline

3. Expected Output

Module: Break WF Defense (Defense Evaluation)

Dataset (Defense)

Instance Structure

Evaluation Scenarios

Defense Simulation Scenarios

How to Run

Common: Feature Extraction & Preprocessing

Experiment 1 : Closed-World

Experiment 2 : Open-World (Binary)

Experiment 3 : Open-World (Multi-class)

Reference Papers

Questions & Contact

About

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages

Name		Name	Last commit message	Last commit date
Closed.ipynb		Closed.ipynb
Open_binary.ipynb		Open_binary.ipynb
Open_multi.ipynb		Open_multi.ipynb
README.md		README.md
break_WF_defense.ipynb		break_WF_defense.ipynb

Uh oh!

Latest commit

History

Folders and files

Repository files navigation

MLTor

Project Overview

Dataset

File Structure

File Descriptions

Experiment 1: Closed-World

1. How to Run

2. Execution Pipeline

3. Expected Output

Experiment 2: Open-World (Binary)

1. How to Run

2. Execution Pipeline

3. Expected Output

Experiment 3: Open-World (Multi-Class)

1. How to Run

2. Execution Pipeline

3. Expected Output

Module: Break WF Defense (Defense Evaluation)

Dataset (Defense)

Instance Structure

Evaluation Scenarios

Defense Simulation Scenarios

How to Run

Common: Feature Extraction & Preprocessing

Experiment 1 : Closed-World

Experiment 2 : Open-World (Binary)

Experiment 3 : Open-World (Multi-class)

Reference Papers

Questions & Contact

About

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages