Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) by wyf027 · Pull Request #970 · MapsterMapper/Mapster · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900) - #970

Closed
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev
Closed

fix: apply custom Map results when mapping to existing target (#900)#970
wyf027 wants to merge 1 commit into
MapsterMapper:developmentfrom
wyf027:fix/getter-only-maptotarget-900-dev

Conversation

@wyf027

@wyf027wyf027 commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Fixes MapToTarget (mapper.Map(dto, existingEntity)) ignoring custom .Map() resolvers when the destination member already has a value.
  • When a destination member has an explicit custom .Map() configuration, skip passing the existing destination member into nested adaptation so the resolver result is assigned directly.
  • Adds regression tests reproducing issue Mapping an object with getter only properties seems to be broken in v10.0.6 (works as expected in 7.4.0) #900 for MapToTarget with pre-existing destination values, null destination members, and new-object mapping.

Root cause

For MapToTarget, ClassAdapter always passed the existing destination member expression into CreateAdaptExpression. That triggered nested MapToTarget adaptation for the member type. For immutable/getter-only types (like primary-constructor classes), nested mapping preserves the existing destination instance instead of replacing it with the custom .Map() result.

Test plan

  • CI passes on Mapster.Tests
  • WhenMappingGetterOnlyMapToTargetRegression.MapToTarget_WithCustomMap_ShouldReplaceExistingDestinationMemberValue
  • Existing MapToTarget regression tests remain green

Fixes#900

MapToTarget was passing the existing destination member into nested
adaptation even when a custom .Map() resolver already computed the final
value, causing immutable/getter-only member values to be preserved.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Comment on lines +33 to +34
config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@DocSvartzDocSvartzMay 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andrerav@stagep
I think users want something like this.

 config.NewConfig<Poco, Dto>()
.Map(dto => dto.Age, src => src.AgeString)
.OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.DefaultValue("42"));

But Map doesn't override the type mapping behavior; it can simply provide another alternative source.

Example For this case:

config.NewConfig<Dto900, Entity900>()
.Map(x => x.Data, x => x.Data ) .OvverideTypesConfigForMapPair(cfg=> cfg.MapWith(x => x.Data == null ? null : new Data900(x.Data.Value));

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixes #900 — custom .Map(...) results now apply on MapToTarget / getter-only destinations (ClassAdapter + BaseClassAdapter). Branch rebased on latest development. Awaiting workflow approval for CI.

@wyf027

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Thanks @DocSvartzOverrideTypesConfigForMapPair (or similar) would be a cleaner long-term API for overriding nested type-mapping behavior from a member .Map.

This PR stays intentionally minimal: #900 reports that an explicit .Map(x => x.Data, …) is ignored on MapToTarget because ClassAdapter always prefers UseDestinationValue/destination member when MapType.MapToTarget, even when a custom resolver exists. The fix only skips destination-member reuse when a custom map resolver is present (HasCustomMemberMap).

Happy to pivot to a config-override API if maintainers prefer that direction — the regression tests should still apply either way.

@wyf027wyf027 closed this by deleting the head repository Jun 23, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wyf027@DocSvartz