Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0 - #756

Closed
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6
Closed

Update package-lock.json to be compatible with npm 6.5.0#756
yamgent wants to merge 2 commits into
MarkBind:masterfrom
yamgent:npm-6

Conversation

@yamgent

@yamgentyamgent commented Mar 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put "X" next to an item, remove the rest)

• [X] Other, please explain: package-lock.json update

What is the rationale for this request?

  • No one in the development team uses npm 5, so it does not make sense to enforce using npm 5.
  • Even using an older npm version causes few changes in package-lock.json anyway, so if someone install new things, it is inevitable that someone will have to update the package-lock.json.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

The package-lock.json is generated updated by running:

npm i

Then, package-lock.json is modified so that cheerio uses our htmlparser instead of the original htmlparser.

Provide some example code that this change will affect:
NIL

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Check that it does not break anything.

Testing instructions:
NIL

The package-lock.json is generated by running:
npm i
This is a manual change, and must be done after we do an npm install
everytime.
@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

We now have to be careful not to overwrite this line (2bd9121) every time we update package-lock.json.

Otherwise everything seems to be fine for now.

@yamgent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

As discussed on slack:

On the issue of the npm version, I am still not convinced that updating package-lock.json with npm 6 is a good decision for now (the corresponding diff can be seen in this PR[1]). There is some questionable change in the version specification (meaning there could be a time when someone updates package-lock.json and suddenly our entire build just breaks). I would check all of the package versions if I have the time, but this could be a huge change and I am strapped for time recently to make that kind of check.

Let's stick with using an older npm 5 version. npm 5.10.0 seems to still be making some minor changes[2]. Let's go lower and try npm 5.9.0. (My own edit: We have since decided to use npm 5.8.0, because 5.9.0 didn't have a proper release.

On a side note, does anyone from the senior dev team know what was the npm version that was used to maintain our package-lock.json since last year?

[1] - #756
[2] - #758 (comment)

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@yamgent