Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Better support for optional arguments by qmfrederik · Pull Request #12 · MasterDevs/ChromeDevTools · GitHub
Skip to content

Better support for optional arguments - #12

Merged
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments
Mar 16, 2017
Merged

Better support for optional arguments#12
brewdente merged 8 commits into
MasterDevs:masterfrom
quamotion:fixes/optional-arguments

Conversation

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The debugger protocol defines optional arguments (like the executionContextId argument on the runScript method.

When this property is present in the JSON, even with the default value of 0, the Chrome debugger will try to interpret this value. This caused some issues for me - I don't know which value to provide for the executionContextId and Chrome wasn't happy with the default value of 0, but if I removed the executionContextId property from the generated JSON, all was well.

This PR changes the code generation of optional properties of type long and bool to use nullable types long? and bool?, and adds a [JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)] attribute to all operational properties, ensuring they are absent from the generated JSON unless explicitely set.

This PR builds on #10 (which now has passing unit tests) so you'd probably want to review that PR first, and then evaluate this one.

If you have questions/feedback, let me know!

…attribute to ensure the mapping is done properly
- Set NullValueHandling to NullValueHandling.Ignore, so that null values are not serialized
- If .NET primitive types (like bool or long) are optional, use nulltable types, so that they can be ignored when serializing
@brewdente

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, this one seemed to have gotten lost. Is it still worth merging this one? I think so, but I'm afraid it might break the other pull requests here? Any thoughts?

@qmfrederik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Well, in the end it's mainly the code-generating logic that has changed. This is a pretty important one for us, so it would be good if you can accept this.

I'd suggest to do this before #15, and have #15 re-generate the C# code based on these changes. That way, ChromeDevTools is fully up to date once more :)

I'll try to take some time later today to fix issues with the .NET Core tooling - VS2017 has been released so that needs some updating.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@qmfrederik@brewdente